Laszlo Papp wrote:
Hi,
Just found this post from Brad:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-February/042556.html
I would suggest to improve the warning message. It is not exactly clear
why that happens to a user like me.
My colleague saw this warning in his cmake output when he was
On 04/10/2013 07:20 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Is there any reason this variable shouldn't be special-cased in the unused
variable handling? If the special case is spelled correctly, it should be
fine.
If you want to add a whitelist to suppress the warning that's fine with me.
-Brad
--
Am 10.04.2013 16:17, schrieb Brad King:
On 04/10/2013 07:20 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Is there any reason this variable shouldn't be special-cased in the
unused
variable handling? If the special case is spelled correctly, it
should be
fine.
If you want to add a whitelist to suppress the
On 04/10/2013 10:30 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
I think what Stephen had in mind (I really hope he had *g*) is to show
a different warning in that case, telling the user that the toolchain
file is ignored on any subsequent run.
Another approach is to not warn when the -DFOO=bar option just
Brad King wrote:
On 04/10/2013 10:30 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
I think what Stephen had in mind (I really hope he had *g*) is to show
a different warning in that case, telling the user that the toolchain
file is ignored on any subsequent run.
Another approach is to not warn when the
Hi,
Just found this post from Brad:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-February/042556.html
I would suggest to improve the warning message. It is not exactly clear why
that happens to a user like me.
Laszlo
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
