Re: [cmake-developers] Supporting monolithic and efficient CMake + Ninja builds for LLVM developers

2015-08-10 Thread Brad King
On 08/07/2015 07:38 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Chris Bieneman wrote: >> One big things I'm working on is improving the way we build our runtime >> libraries. These libraries are built for the targets that the compiler >> supports generating code for, so they can use different architectures, >> head

Re: [cmake-developers] Supporting monolithic and efficient CMake + Ninja builds for LLVM developers

2015-08-07 Thread Stephen Kelly
Chris Bieneman wrote: > One big things I’m working on is improving the way we build our runtime > libraries. These libraries are built for the targets that the compiler > supports generating code for, so they can use different architectures, > headers, and libraries than are used to build the comp

[cmake-developers] Supporting monolithic and efficient CMake + Ninja builds for LLVM developers

2015-08-06 Thread Chris Bieneman
Stephen Kelly wrote: > Chris Bieneman wrote: > >> (resending now that I’ve subscribed to cmake-developers) >> >> Hello CMake-Developers, >> >> I’m a contributor to the LLVM project working on improving our CMake-based >> build process, and I had a request I wanted to discuss with your >> commun

Re: [cmake-developers] Supporting monolithic and efficient CMake + Ninja builds for LLVM developers

2015-08-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Chris Bieneman wrote: > (resending now that I’ve subscribed to cmake-developers) > > Hello CMake-Developers, > > I’m a contributor to the LLVM project working on improving our CMake-based > build process, and I had a request I wanted to discuss with your > community. > > This is related to a fe

[cmake-developers] Supporting monolithic and efficient CMake + Ninja builds for LLVM developers

2015-08-05 Thread Chris Bieneman
(resending now that I’ve subscribed to cmake-developers) Hello CMake-Developers, I’m a contributor to the LLVM project working on improving our CMake-based build process, and I had a request I wanted to discuss with your community. This is related to a feature request I filed (http://public.ki