Re: [cmake-developers] Using pkgconf

2018-06-15 Thread APEKE, SENA (ext)
To: Paul Fultz II Cc: cmake-developers@cmake.org Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] Using pkgconf On 06/14/2018 01:20 PM, Paul Fultz II wrote: >> meta-packages that cover multiple components? > > You can just create a .pc file that adds each component in the requires. That assumes that al

Re: [cmake-developers] Using pkgconf

2018-06-14 Thread Paul Fultz II via cmake-developers
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:54 AM, Brad King wrote: > > On 06/12/2018 12:11 PM, Paul Fultz II via cmake-developers wrote: >> https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf >> >> CMake could use pkgconf internally > > The license looks MIT-like. > > Please confirm that it is at least BSD-3 compatible. I am

Re: [cmake-developers] Using pkgconf

2018-06-13 Thread Brad King
On 06/12/2018 12:11 PM, Paul Fultz II via cmake-developers wrote: > https://github.com/pkgconf/pkgconf > > CMake could use pkgconf internally The license looks MIT-like. Please confirm that it is at least BSD-3 compatible. > find_package(zlib CONF) > > And this would look up zlib using

[cmake-developers] Using pkgconf

2018-06-12 Thread Paul Fultz II via cmake-developers
Hi All, So from a previous threads, we were discussing pkgconfig and cmake interoperability. One issue with using pkgconfig currently, is that the results are completely flat. This is due to using the CLI to retrieve pkgconfig, which gives the user all the flags from every transitive package.