Re: [cmake-developers] Weird behaviour of arguments in macro

2013-11-19 Thread Brad King
On 11/19/2013 02:37 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: Done and updated the topic. Great, thanks. It looks pretty good now. I just replaced the topic on the stage again with minor edits. Please merge to 'next' after the current topic pause is lifted. Thanks, -Brad -- Powered by

Re: [cmake-developers] Weird behaviour of arguments in macro

2013-11-18 Thread Daniele E. Domenichelli
On 15/11/13 17:41, Brad King wrote: On 11/15/2013 03:27 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: So I believe that some more documentation would be helpful... If you agree, I can write it... Fine with me! One reason we changed to the rst-formatted documentation is to make it easier to write and

Re: [cmake-developers] Weird behaviour of arguments in macro

2013-11-18 Thread Brad King
On 11/18/2013 08:41 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: Done, see topic macro-args-docs. Good start. Please place the :: starting a literal block at the end of the previous paragraph when the block is part of the paragraph. For example: +Therefore you will NOT be able to use commands like: +

Re: [cmake-developers] Weird behaviour of arguments in macro

2013-11-18 Thread Daniele E. Domenichelli
Hello Brad, On 18/11/13 18:44, Brad King wrote: Please place the :: starting a literal block at the end of the previous paragraph when the block is part of the paragraph. [...] Also please use ``inline-code-example`` syntax for text referring to constructs from the literal blocks. [...]

Re: [cmake-developers] Weird behaviour of arguments in macro

2013-11-15 Thread Brad King
On 11/15/2013 03:27 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: So I believe that some more documentation would be helpful... If you agree, I can write it... Fine with me! One reason we changed to the rst-formatted documentation is to make it easier to write and for contributors to modify. Please push