2013/9/3 Daniel Pfeifer :
> 2013/9/3 Brad King :
>> On 09/03/2013 03:39 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
>>> According to http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12930#c30721,
>>> WindowsAppContainer will not pass /ZW to the command line.
>>> Hence, setting VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS will not enable C++/CX and the
2013/9/3 Brad King :
> On 09/03/2013 03:39 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
>> According to http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12930#c30721,
>> WindowsAppContainer will not pass /ZW to the command line.
>> Hence, setting VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS will not enable C++/CX and the
>> documentation is incorrect. B
On 09/03/2013 03:39 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
> According to http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12930#c30721,
> WindowsAppContainer will not pass /ZW to the command line.
> Hence, setting VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS will not enable C++/CX and the
> documentation is incorrect. But that is good.
>
> Maybe
2013/9/2 Brad King :
> On 09/02/2013 11:42 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
>> The target property VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS is documented as: "Can be set
>> to enable C++/CX language extensions."
>> Is that really what this property does?
> [snip]
>> So my question again: Does VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS really enable
On 09/02/2013 11:42 AM, Daniel Pfeifer wrote:
> The target property VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS is documented as: "Can be set
> to enable C++/CX language extensions."
> Is that really what this property does?
[snip]
> So my question again: Does VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS really enable C++/CX? I hope
> not.
This
Hi,
The target property VS_WINRT_EXTENSIONS is documented as: "Can be set
to enable C++/CX language extensions."
Is that really what this property does?
I am trying to build a C++ project (no C++/CX) for ARM with Visual Studio 2012.
As an example, I took the following code:
http://msdn.mic
