On Tuesday 01 November 2011, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote:
...
If you do that, you create a circular dependency, since CMake requires Qt
to build its GUI application. Yes, you could build CMake's command line
tools only, then Qt, then build CMake's GUI app, or alternatively you
could install
On Friday, October 28, 2011 07:58:25 Clinton Stimpson wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011 06:21:23 am Stephen Kelly wrote:
On Friday, October 28, 2011 13:56:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday, 28 de October de 2011 13:13:20 Stephen Kelly wrote:
* If you want to be easily found for others
On Friday, October 28, 2011 13:13:20 Stephen Kelly wrote:
== Summary ==
I'm considering adding some cmake files to Qt, which would be installed by
Qt, and which would make it easier for CMake based projects to depend on
Qt.
I'm CC'ing the cmake developers too see what they think of the
On Friday, October 28, 2011 13:56:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday, 28 de October de 2011 13:13:20 Stephen Kelly wrote:
* If you want to be easily found for others to depend on, you write a
PackageConfig.cmake file and install it to a location CMake
will use
to find
On Friday, October 28, 2011 16:24:08 Matt Williams wrote:
On 28 October 2011 14:44, lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
I think that's reasonable in general. It's similar to what we do to
support pkgconfig. I agree with Thiago's comment that this should be
split and we should have one file per
