[CMS-PIPELINES] Wikipedia and EBCDIC 037-2

2020-09-15 Thread Glenn Knickerbocker
Somebody pointed out today that a mass purge of Wikipedia EBCDIC code page articles was done in July (with a move to Wikibooks begun but not finished). For the most part, the objection was that they simply reproduced information from primary sources. 037-2 seems like an exception, unacknowledged

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Wikipedia and EBCDIC 037-2

2020-09-15 Thread Rick Troth
As I recall (and this was a hot topic for me and others around 1990, especially at the SHARE conference) "CP 37 v2" was what customers called the corrected version of Codepage 37. Codepage 37 was an excellent attempt by IBM to capture standard practice at the time (in the US) along with full align

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Wikipedia and EBCDIC 037-2

2020-09-15 Thread Glenn Knickerbocker
On 9/15/2020 6:08 PM, Rick Troth wrote: > Same then goes for the square brackets (and their mis-mapped > counterparts). IBM introduced Codepage 1047 which GETS BRACKETS RIGHT. I > forget, as I write this, if CP 1047 gets not/circumflex right and I'm > having trouble pulling the codepages out of Wik

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Wikipedia and EBCDIC 037-2

2020-09-15 Thread Rick Troth
[headslap] The light goes on slowly. So this "purge" was broad brush. I'm not a "wikipedian", just a heavy use, and regular supporter. (IF THAT MATTERS) Rule #1, don't break stuff. I thought I must be doing something wrong that I can no longer find pages like "EBCDIC_1047". But maybe those are par

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Wikipedia and EBCDIC 037-2

2020-09-15 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2020-09-15, at 16:08:08, Rick Troth wrote: > > Same then goes for the square brackets (and their mis-mapped > counterparts). IBM introduced Codepage 1047 which GETS BRACKETS RIGHT. I > forget, as I write this, if CP 1047 gets not/circumflex right and I'm > having trouble pulling the codepages ou