On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 01:56, Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:
> Partly because they're all solutions to different things. I have a bad
> habit of editing out too much of what I think is repetitive, leaving
> things confusingly out of context.
>
> Here's my original statement:
>
> > I had records to
On 3/22/23 09:21, Rob van der Heij wrote:
.. | y: if locate -80 | x: if chop -80 | x: | y: | ...
Why -80 ? That would make the second record limited to 80 rather than
the first, as I believe Glenn wants.
.. | y: if locate 81 | x: if chop 80 | x: | y: | ...
I like the second IF. Never thou
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 12:09, John P. Hartmann wrote:
> On 3/22/23 09:21, Rob van der Heij wrote:
> > .. | y: if locate -80 | x: if chop -80 | x: | y: | ...
>
> Why -80 ? That would make the second record limited to 80 rather than
> the first, as I believe Glenn wants.
>
> .. | y: if locate 81
