On 2017-02-20, at 00:09, Kris Buelens wrote:
> I used it too, but abandoned it:
> -it wasn't very fast, and
> -it was impossible to combine it well with REXX when it had to handle dual
> byte characters:
>
Which Rexx?
MBCS? A challenge:
pipe literal English français русский | xlate upper
I used it too, but abandoned it:
-it wasn't very fast, and
-it was impossible to combine it well with REXX when it had to handle dual
byte characters:
I wanted to use Pipes and Rexx to manage my vacation & family photo's, and
when I create panorama's I get names like this
GR2009_6975-GR2009_6978
Actually there are two versions of this particular implementation...The
one pointed to by the link I sent:
" This is the initial release of a non .NET version of PC-Pipes. It is
written in CPP and mirrors the .NET version in program logic and
structure. Except for the Dispatcher and the interface
Thanks.
Yes, I had seen that one.
My heart sank when I saw it requires .Net.
-- R; <><
On 02/19/2017 04:08 PM, DeWayne Thomas wrote:
> Have you looked at this one?
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pc-pipelines/files/?source=navbar
>
> D>
>
>
> On 02/19/2017 09:40 AM, Rick Troth wrote:
>> Ho
Have you looked at this one?
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pc-pipelines/files/?source=navbar
D>
On 02/19/2017 09:40 AM, Rick Troth wrote:
How many of us crave Pipelines when working with other systems?
I have seen at least two, probably three (maybe more) implementations of
Pipelines for
On 2017-02-19, at 09:40, Rick Troth wrote:
> How many of us crave Pipelines when working with other systems?
> ...
Interesting. But don't be surprised if it gets reaction similar
to that, sometimes vulgar, that I've gotten when I mentioned
regular expressions on some of the z-LISTSERVs.
-- g
How many of us crave Pipelines when working with other systems?
I have seen at least two, probably three (maybe more) implementations of
Pipelines for systems other than CMS or MVS. Never could get into them
because they required heavy (IMO) supporting infrastructure. They're not
portable. They're
