I thought Kevin was showing the possessive form
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rich Knowles r...@sailpower.ca
Date: Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Prop Options
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Certainly. Others is the correct spelling.
Rich
I read it as an adjective, but I guess both work:)
Rich
On Apr 29, 2014, at 14:05, Persuasion persuasio...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought Kevin was showing the possessive form
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rich Knowles r...@sailpower.ca
Date: Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:01 PM
if it was a possessive, it has to be “others’”
From: Persuasion
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:05 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
I thought Kevin was showing the possessive form
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rich Knowles r...@sailpower.ca
, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Marek Dziedzic dziedzi...@hotmail.comwrote:
if it was a possessive, it has to be “others’”
*From:* Persuasion persuasio...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:05 PM
*To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
*Subject:* Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
I thought Kevin was showing
-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
I thought Kevin was showing the possessive form
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rich Knowles r...@sailpower.ca
Date: Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Prop Options
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com cnc-list@cnc
PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
I thought Kevin was showing the possessive form
-- Forwarded message --From: Rich Knowles r...@sailpower.ca
Date: Tue, Apr
29, 2014 at 12:01 PMSubject: Re: Stus-List Prop OptionsTo: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com
*Sent: *Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:00 PM
*To: *cnc-list@cnc-list.com
*Reply To: *cnc-list@cnc-list.com
*Subject: *Re: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
Thank you Marek, I was incorrect. Obviously *others *have missed the
point about reading the thread before, but I look forward to Rich cleaning
up
:-)
From: Kevin DriscollSent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:00 PMTo: cnc-list@cnc-list.comReply To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
Thank you Marek, I was incorrect. Obviously others have missed the point about reading the thread before, but I look forward to Rich cleaning
- you're American!
No one expects perfect English from down there.
sam :-)
From: Kevin Driscoll
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:00 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Reply To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
Thank you Marek, I was incorrect. Obviously others have
Yea right.and you got a lot more needles responses that fill up my inbox
_
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Kevin
Driscoll
Sent: April 29, 2014 3:59 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
Thank you Marek, I
Of Kevin
Driscoll
Sent: April 29, 2014 3:59 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
Thank you Marek, I was incorrect. Obviously others have missed the point about
reading the thread before, but I look forward to Rich cleaning up others'
spelling and grammar
Probably…can I use tequila as the reason for my mistake
_
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of
sam.c.sal...@gmail.com
Sent: April 29, 2014 7:44 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Fwd: Prop Options
…or should that have been “needless
12 matches
Mail list logo
