Excerpts from Vreman, Peter's message of Tue Jan 12 05:51:13 -0500 2010:
> I still have the patches below for cobbler. Can the patches be integrated
> upstream?
I'll have a look at these today. I'll try to get them pushed to my
personal branch tonight and the fedorahosted in the next two days
(pe
No, I haven't included a patch with this functionality. It looks like the
rpm used to run reserialize on install so there wouldn't be any out of sync
metadata and fields. It was probably meant to be added back at some point?
Look at the git master. It's still in the spec file.
$ grep -ri reser
I still have the patches below for cobbler. Can the patches be integrated
upstream?
The Koan and CLI error handling patches are real issues that break scripts and
KVM virsh console support.
Regards,
Peter
From: cobbler-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:cobbler-devel-boun...@lists.
> > Can you explain what you mean a bit more? The distro is generally
> > sucked in from an install tree which (as a side effect) includes a
> > kernel / initrd combo. It would be quite nice to have the
> > kernel/initrd be per-profile instead of per-distro but things like
> > anaconda get really c
