so.. I'm ready when your comfortable on the merge.
Earlier in the threadi suggested the make webtest, as that's the
primary method i've been using. However someone suggested the rpm
method, and it occurred to me that it was a bit safer and cleaner. (i
somehow lost all my data first timei ran web
>>
>> Still there for those of you interested in the current state of affairs :)
>
> What point would you be interested in getting this merged?
>
>> And as was discussed before... best way to test it is:
>>
>> checkout
>> use make to build rpms
>> update to the new RPMs
>
> You used to also be able
On Mon, 2 May 2011 16:38:47 -0500, Greg Swift wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 21:25, Greg Swift wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:10, Scott Henson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 10 Apr 2011 18:40:14 -0500, Greg Swift
> >> wrote:
> >> > So you can follow along here:
> >> > https://github.com/greg