On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 10:27:54 -0500, Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com wrote:
So.. I never got a response on this... anyone?
I generally go with the doer is allowed the final say. Having said that,
I'd say require puppet-server. It seems cleaner.
--
Scott Henson
Red Hat CIS Operator
WVU Alum
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:31, Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 16:16, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
Scott Henson wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:37:08 -0600, Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all. This is a patch I put together that might be
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 16:16, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote:
Scott Henson wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:37:08 -0600, Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all. This is a patch I put together that might be useful for
letting puppet access cobbler using the ext-nodes script
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:37:08 -0600, Greg Swift gregsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all. This is a patch I put together that might be useful for letting
puppet access cobbler using the ext-nodes script without having to move
files (binary and config) from your cobbler server to install on your puppet
