That crossed my mind as well, but i think it's nicer to dedicate a major
release.
It's also what people expect judging from version numbers (
http://semver.org/).
Also 2.8 will be sort of a LTS version of Cobbler for users that depended
on features killed in 3.0
If you could help out again that wo
On 05/04/2015 03:15 PM, Jörgen Maas wrote:
Yes, i've created a release28 branch from the release26 branch (how
weird is that).The reasoning is that we need another major release
series in which much stuff will be deprecated and properly documented
first before we remove it in 3.0 and cause a lo
Hi Alan,
Yes, i've created a release28 branch from the release26 branch (how weird
is that).The reasoning is that we need another major release series in
which much stuff will be deprecated and properly documented first before we
remove it in 3.0 and cause a lot of user confusion and regressions.
On 11/17/2014 06:37 AM, Jörgen Maas wrote:
I dont think there will be a 2.8, at least not branched from master.
Whatever is in master will be 3.0, there's just too many changes in
master to backport to stable branches.
Jorgen, I have seen some 2.8 initiative recently. Has this ^ changed?
Reg
On 11/17/2014 06:37 AM, Jörgen Maas wrote:
Alan,
I dont think there will be a 2.8, at least not branched from master.
Whatever is in master will be 3.0, there's just too many changes in
master to backport to stable branches.
Ah I see, makes sense. Thanks for clarifying it.
Regards,
Alan Eva
Alan,
I dont think there will be a 2.8, at least not branched from master.
Whatever is in master will be 3.0, there's just too many changes in master
to backport to stable branches.
When 3.0 will be released is up for debate; all development is driven by
the users of Cobbler
At the very least
Jörgen, when do you plan to release Cobbler 2.8? You already know what
will be on it
(bug fixes, new features, doc improvements, refactorings)?
Regards,
Alan Evangelista
___
cobbler-devel mailing list
cobbler-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://list
