Re: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469

2010-01-12 Thread Jonathan Sabo
e": "", "redhat_management_key": "<>", "virt_path": "<>", "power_user": "", "kernel_options": {}, "name_servers": [], "mtime": 1263251533.1548419, "template_files": {}, &

Re: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469

2010-01-09 Thread Cristian Ciupitu
> From: Jonathan Sabo > To: cobbler development list > Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 11:32:52 PM > Subject: Re: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469 > > Right because the previously created json didn't have the new fields > entries. If you reserialized, which at

Re: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469

2010-01-09 Thread Jonathan Sabo
sync, assuming that's possible? On 1/9/10, Cristian Ciupitu wrote: >>From: Jonathan Sabo >>To: cobbler development list >>Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 2:43:55 AM >>Subject: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469 >> >>I wanted to see if I could get an upda

Re: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469

2010-01-09 Thread Cristian Ciupitu
>From: Jonathan Sabo >To: cobbler development list >Sent: Sat, January 9, 2010 2:43:55 AM >Subject: ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469 > >I wanted to see if I could get an update on the status of this ticket >and see when the patch would be included. Sorry to be

ipv6 fields and ipv4 mtu fields rfe #469

2010-01-09 Thread Jonathan Sabo
I wanted to see if I could get an update on the status of this ticket and see when the patch would be included. Sorry to be a pest but it's been awhile now. Thanks, Jonathan ___ cobbler-devel mailing list cobbler-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fe