2017-10-26 13:02 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Julia,
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-15 18:55 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>> > Make coccicheck checked for the existence of DEBUG_FILE on each semantic
>> > patch, and bailed if it already existed. This meant that
2017-09-24 5:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> This improves the patch mode of setup_timer.cocci. Several patterns
>> were missing:
>> - assignments-before-init_timer() cases
>> - limit the .data case removal to the specific struct timer_list instance
>>
2017-10-09 4:18 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> This semantic patch detects duplicate arrays declared using BQ27XXX_DATA
> within a single structure. It is currently specific to the file
> drivers/power/supply/bq27xxx_battery.c. Nevertheless, having the script in
> the kernel will allow others to chec
2017-10-30 12:52 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> Hi Julia,
>>
>>
>> 2017-10-29 8:43 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>> > /// is to describe the semantic patch, while //# indicates reasons
>> > for false positives.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
>> >
2017-10-26 16:22 GMT+09:00 Nicolas Palix (LIG) :
> Le 26/10/17 à 06:55, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
>>
>> If you run coccicheck with V=1 and COCCI=, you will see a strange
>> path to the semantic patch file. For example, run the following:
>>
>> $ make V=1 COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/free/kfree.cocci c
2017-08-23 22:11 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
> Allow messages about multiple timers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall
>
> ---
Applied to linux-kbuild/misc.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
___
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6
2017-10-26 16:26 GMT+09:00 Nicolas Palix (LIG) :
> Le 26/10/17 à 06:59, Julia Lawall a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>
>>> Currently, the required version for badzero.cocci is picked up from
>>> its "Comments:" line since it contains the word "Requires".
>>>
>>> S
>> @section_specification@
>> type T;
>> @@
>> T rcar_pcie_enable_msi(...)
>> + __attribute__((section ("my_update")))
>
> I don't see any evidence that kernel developers would welcome this change
> in this form.
There is no welcome needed by them because the shown addition would be
nice for tes
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> @section_specification@
> >> type T;
> >> @@
> >> T rcar_pcie_enable_msi(...)
> >> + __attribute__((section ("my_update")))
This works now. It should have worked before, but the change was done
incompletely.
julia