2017-11-14 21:35 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall :
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> The command "make -j8 C=1 CHECK=scripts/coccicheck COCCI=..." produces
>> lots of "coccicheck failed" error messages.
>>
>> Julia Lawall explained the Coccinelle behavior as follows:
>> "The problem on
On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 18:12 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:05:36AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 15:19 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > There is no need to #define the license of the driver, just put it in
> > > the MODULE_LICENSE() line di
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 15:30 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> --- /dev/null 2017-11-23 06:19:12.943046739 -0800
> +++ single_use_module.pl 2017-11-23 15:23:11.729812156 -0800
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
[]
> +$data =~ s~$var~$string~;
this needs to be:
$data =~ s~\b$var\b~$string~;
> Setting NPROC=1 is a reasonable solution;
It can be sufficient for the usual purposes of the shell script
“scripts/coccicheck”.
> spatch does not create the subdirectory.
I would like to point out that further development efforts will be needed
if such a special directory handling should be
> The goal is that the user can easily find the stdou and stderr information
> while the semantic patch is running.
It matters when the tool “spatch” tries to apply its own parallelisation
strategy.
> This is useful for long running semantic patches to see
> if things are going well or not.
Ye
