>> @adjustment@ >> expression ex; >> statement S; >> @@ >> -LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY >> +hlist_for_each_entry >> (..., ..., >> -ex, >> ...) >> S > > This is not completely a good idea.
I tried to show another approach. > The ... in the argument list will match a sequence of things, not a single > thing. How does this information fit to the specification of the SmPL ellipsis as a placeholder for the last macro parameter? > It could be: > > -LIST_FOR_EACH_ENTRY > +hlist_for_each_entry > (e1,e2, Are these metavariables required for such an use case? > -ex, > ...) > S Can such a transformation variant have nicer run time characteristics in comparison to the initial SmPL script example? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
