On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 07:47:05AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi !
> >
> > Trying to do some verification of the coccinelle tool
> > it self and one of the tasks was to estimate false
> > negatives (so reliability not accuracy). To
Hi,
Is there a plan for a new release after 1.0.7? 1.0.7 was not tagged and
no tarballs were released, so I'm not sure what is the status of it.
Additionally, I've had problems compiling it, and bisected it to this
commit:
commit 7ab8f01b63d7cdec988e5f05065f3c18fdab7319 (refs/bisect/bad)
Author:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a plan for a new release after 1.0.7? 1.0.7 was not tagged and
> no tarballs were released, so I'm not sure what is the status of it.
> Additionally, I've had problems compiling it, and bisected it to this
> commit:
>
> commit 7ab8f0
> I'm not sure it's a regression, but I just couldn't get the attributes
> to work with 1.0.6 either with and without Johannes' changes to upgrade
> it to the 1.0.6 syntax.
>
> This is the cocci that doesn't work (which is supposed to work with
> 1.0.6):
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ker
Hi Julia,
Thanks for the quick response!
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 15:19 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Luciano Coelho wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a plan for a new release after 1.0.7? 1.0.7 was not tagged
> > and
> > no tarballs were released, so I'm not sure what is th
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 15:43 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > I'm not sure it's a regression, but I just couldn't get the
> > attributes
> > to work with 1.0.6 either with and without Johannes' changes to
> > upgrade
> > it to the 1.0.6 syntax.
> >
> > This is the cocci that doesn't work (which is su
