On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:39 AM Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I would be interested to find out why coccinelle wasn't able to do the
> > last 1%, but only as part of a long-term learning process on getting
> > better with coccinelle - …
>
> How will corresponding software development resources
Hi Markus,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:37 AM Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Convert the last few remaining mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new
> > mmap locking API. These were missed by coccinelle for some reason
>
> Will the clarification of this software situation become more interesting?
>
> > (I
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:00 AM Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> >>> The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rules:
> >>
> >> Would you like to apply only a single SmPL rule here?
> >
> > I think this version of the patch is already a single rule,
> > similar to what you suggested ?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 12:22 AM Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new
> > mmap locking API instead.
> >
> > The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rules:
>
> Would you like to apply only a single SmPL rule here?
I