On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > In the previous fix that I made, I just caused the missing type,
> > which was hidden under a macro, to make the match fail.
>
> How do you think about to make this detail configurable?
On this case, there is nothing to configure. If there is no k
> In the previous fix that I made, I just caused the missing type,
> which was hidden under a macro, to make the match fail.
How do you think about to make this detail configurable?
> In this case, though perhaps you would prefer T to be bound to int?
Does the C programming language specify tha
