> Perhaps, but it will unnecessarily raise the running time of your semantic
> patch.
We come along different expectations again for the possible application
of the construct “<+... … ...+>” for the semantic patch language.
Should the concrete run time characteristics be clarified any more
for
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> @replacement@
> >> constant c;
> >> identifier text;
> >> statement is, es;
> >> @@
> >> <+...
> >
> > What is thhe point of the outer <+... ...+>?
>
> I would like to stress the possibility that source code adjustments
> can be performed
>> @replacement@
>> constant c;
>> identifier text;
>> statement is, es;
>> @@
>> <+...
>
> What is thhe point of the outer <+... ...+>?
I would like to stress the possibility that source code adjustments
can be performed multiple times.
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The strcmp output has to be compared to zero strcmp(src_name,
> > "equalizer_input_level") == 0.
>
> Would you like to let the following script for the semantic patch language
> perform any changes in your source files automatically?
>
>
> The strcmp output has to be compared to zero strcmp(src_name,
> "equalizer_input_level") == 0.
Would you like to let the following script for the semantic patch language
perform any changes in your source files automatically?
@replacement@
constant c;
identifier text;
statement is, es;
@@
>> @display@
>> expression X;
>> identifier I;
>> @@
>> *auto I = X(...);
…
> I think it expects a type as well. I don't know if that is a reasonable
> assumption in C or in C++.
How do you think about to interpret such a variable definition in the way
that the omission of an other data type
> If you are showing a patch, then the first column is empty,
> except for the - and + characters.
You are right.
I am sorry for my misinterpretation of the “indentation” at this place.
Regards,
Markus
___
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Do you distinguish between the storage class specifier
> >> and other uses of such a key word?
> >> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/auto
> >
> > Sorry. I know nothing about C++.
>
> I guess that you know something also for this
>> Do you distinguish between the storage class specifier
>> and other uses of such a key word?
>> https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/auto
>
> Sorry. I know nothing about C++.
I guess that you know something also for this programming language
according to the program option “--c++”.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Where is the space that yoyu are concerned about?
>
> …
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> void on_message_element …
> ↑
>
> How was this character added at the first column in this line
> of my software test approach?
I don't understand. If you are showing a
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Where is the space that yoyu are concerned about?
>
> …
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> void on_message_element …
> ↑
>
> How was this character added at the first column in this line
> of my software test approach?
>
>
> >>
> >>
> Where is the space that yoyu are concerned about?
…
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
void on_message_element …
↑
How was this character added at the first column in this line
of my software test approach?
>>
>>
Hi!
I did not have the time to look at this file. Lots of places comparing two
chars indeed.
The strcmp output has to be compared to zero strcmp(src_name,
"equalizer_input_level") == 0. This is the result returned when the
arguments are equal.
Best Regards,
Wellington.
On Mon,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried the following small script variant out for
> the semantic patch language.
>
> @replacement@
> constant c;
> identifier text;
> expression x;
> statement is, es;
> @@
> char* text = x(...);
>
> if (
> + strcmp(
> text
> +
Hello,
I have tried the following small script variant out for
the semantic patch language.
@replacement@
constant c;
identifier text;
expression x;
statement is, es;
@@
char* text = x(...);
if (
+ strcmp(
text
+ ,
- == std::string(
c
)
)
is
else
es
A corresponding
15 matches
Mail list logo
