Hmmm, I do not think that VisualWorks with VM - 3 - times - faster - than -
java looks like a hystorical artifact ;-)

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com> wrote:

>
> On Jun 17, 2015, at 12:30 PM, Ariel Feinerman <arielfap...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Why just do not use some clone of Smalltalk for Mac OS X before inventing
> new language?
>
>
> Maybe because it wouldn’t achieve any of Apple’s stated goals, like high
> performance and type-safety?
>
> I used Smalltalk-80 extensively back in the ‘80s (while working at Xerox
> no less) and it was a cool language for its time, but it’s a historical
> artifact now. (Yes, I’m aware of Squeak. It’s kind of an SCA of programming
> languages.) If Apple had wanted that sort of language they would have kept
> developing the MacRuby they were putting some resources into a few years
> ago. (Yeah, not the same language, but Ruby’s in the same general family
> and has a lot of ST-80 influence.)
>
> Guys, talking about Swift vs. Obj-C/C/C++ has a slight amount of use, but
> if we start dragging everyone’s pet language into the fray (Algol?
> Burroughs B5000 assembly?) then this just becomes another boring language
> flame-war. Don’t do that.
>
> —Jens
>



-- 
best regards
Ariel
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to