> On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:37 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Dave wrote:
>>
>> Mac Project.
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone
>> further processing until
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> Mac Project.
>
> Hi All,
>
> I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone
> further processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this
> puts the request at the End of the
I've googled til my fingers are black and blue, but no luck finding some
of the older PDF guide documents. I could never express in words how
disappointed I am that Apple discontinued producing readable
documentation - I use to crow about it to all my non-Apple dev friends.
Anyway, does
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 7:51 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> Mac Project.
>
> Hi All,
>
> I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone
> further processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this
> puts the request at the End of the
Mac Project.
Hi All,
I’m using performSelector: withObject: afterDelay: in order to postpone further
processing until after the current method/run loop as expired, this puts the
request at the End of the Queue, my question is, is there anyway of putting it
at the head of the Queue so it gets