On 13.07.2009, at 15:59, I. Savant wrote:
My guess: I think because you're removing (with or without
animation) the bottom field / label, you're changing the autosizing
behavior of the content view's contents while it's being moved around.
On 14.07.2009, at 04:37, Peter N Lewis wrote:
I am trying to resize a window with an animation using the
NSAnimatablePropertyContainer animator proxy mechanism. The views have
the Wants CA Layer option set in IB.
I use this code:
NSRect frame = window.frame;
frame.size.height += delta;
frame.origin.y -= delta;
On 08.06.2009, at 03:09, Bryan Henry wrote:
As someone already said, if your action method is specific enough to
the type of sender object
I should have been clearer about that. Yes, I am only talking about
action methods that are pretty specific and that will not get
connected to
With the new dot notation I sometimes use explicit types in my
IBAction methods:
- (IBAction)doSomething:(UIButton *)button ...
instead of
- (IBAction)doSomething:(id)sender ...
so I don't have to downcast sender to be able to use the dot notation.
Do others do this too? Is this
the
transformation and I was looking specifically for a class that has a
(void)setXXX: method that is not really a property accessor.
Thanks again
_
Marc Liyanage http://www.entropy.ch
with this:
[xyz setString:@foo];
This should be exactly the same. I can’t see how this could behave
like it does when the dot notation is simply syntactic sugar, as the
documentation states.
_
Marc Liyanage
a bookmarklet, LaunchBar
search template etc.:
http://bit.ly/macdev-info
Let me know what you think, especially if you know other useful sites
it should cover.
_
Marc Liyanage http
