Re: Core Data Questions--Relationships, UUIDs, and Dirty States

2008-10-28 Thread chaitanya pandit
On 28-Oct-08, at 2:01 AM, Keary Suska wrote: 1. Confirmation clarification: do I understand correctly, considering typical RDBMS data integrity rules, that for most to-one relationships, I would set the delete rule to no action, since deletion of the many item should not effect the one

Core Data Questions--Relationships, UUIDs, and Dirty States

2008-10-27 Thread Keary Suska
1. Confirmation clarification: do I understand correctly, considering typical RDBMS data integrity rules, that for most to-one relationships, I would set the delete rule to no action, since deletion of the many item should not effect the one item? 2. How do I best implement custom UUIDs

Re: Core Data Questions--Relationships, UUIDs, and Dirty States

2008-10-27 Thread I. Savant
1. Confirmation clarification: do I understand correctly, considering typical RDBMS data integrity rules, that for most to-one relationships, I would set the delete rule to no action, since deletion of the many item should not effect the one item? Impossible to generalize, but generally -

Re: Core Data Questions--Relationships, UUIDs, and Dirty States

2008-10-27 Thread Jim Correia
On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Keary Suska wrote: 1. Confirmation clarification: do I understand correctly, considering typical RDBMS data integrity rules, that for most to-one relationships, I would set the delete rule to no action, since deletion of the many item should not effect the one

Re: Core Data Questions--Relationships, UUIDs, and Dirty States

2008-10-27 Thread Keary Suska
On Oct 27, 2008, at 2:55 PM, I. Savant wrote: 1. Confirmation clarification: do I understand correctly, considering typical RDBMS data integrity rules, that for most to-one relationships, I would set the delete rule to no action, since deletion of the many item should not effect the one