Oh yeah - I thought I did that once and it didn't work... Though, now
that I think about it, I think I did it the other way in the past
(used self in a +method to refer to a newly created object)
So, in all reality, the +method could be boiled down to:
[self.new autorelease] ;
since
On Aug 3, 2009, at 1:13 AM, Christopher J Kemsley kd7...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, in all reality, the +method could be boiled down to:
[self.new autorelease] ;
This is improper use of the dot syntax. new is not a property, so it
should not be accessed using the dot syntax.
--Kyle Sluder
Ok, so here's the deal:
I have a class (CYMethod) that provides a standard interface for
multiple implementations of the same type (multiple ways in which to
read a file, for instance). Here are its constructors:
+ (CYMethod*) method {
return [ [ [CYMethod alloc] init ]
On Aug 2, 2009, at 22:17, Christopher J Kemsley wrote:
How do I make the +method call return an initialized object of
whatever type the +method was sent to? (so that [CYMethodSubclass
method] returns [ [ [CYMethodSubclass alloc] init ] autorelease])
Like this:
return [ [ [[self
On Aug 2, 2009, at 22:26, Quincey Morris wrote:
return [ [ [[self class] alloc] init ] autorelease ] ;
('self' refers to the class object because this is a class method)
Doh, if that's true, then:
return [ [ [self alloc] init ] autorelease ] ;
should be good enough. (IIRC,
