On May 4, 2013, at 12:54 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann gerr...@mdenkmann.de wrote:
Seems to me rather less code.
Well sure, if you want to write *less* code. :)
(To add to the duh factor, I know I wrote other value transformers on that
project.)
--Andy
On May 3, 2013, at 1:29 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann gerr...@mdenkmann.de wrote:
I have a button which only makes sense when exactly one thing is selected.
Currently it's Enabled property is bound to Array
Controller.selectedObjects.@count.
I.e. the button is enabled if one or more things are
On 3 May 2013, at 17:07, Andy Lee ag...@mac.com wrote:
On May 3, 2013, at 1:29 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann gerr...@mdenkmann.de wrote:
I have a button which only makes sense when exactly one thing is selected.
Currently it's Enabled property is bound to Array
Controller.selectedObjects.@count.
Personally I would just use the value transformer approach. It's easy,
obvious, and discoverable. Any other solution I can think up with
would be lacking in at least one of these. I actually find value
transformers to be super helpful when working with bindings. I've used
one for an empty string
I have a button which only makes sense when exactly one thing is selected.
Currently it's Enabled property is bound to Array
Controller.selectedObjects.@count.
I.e. the button is enabled if one or more things are selected.
But I want it to be disabled when nothing is selected AND also if more
