On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jeff Laingjeff.la...@spatialinfo.com wrote:
http://www.simple-talk.com/dotnet/.net-framework/understanding-garbage-collection-in-.net/
(Yes, I do .NET as well as Cocoa)
No real surprises there, except for the closing paragraphs which can be
paraphrased down
Well, no, that's not a good summary of the last couple paragraphs. IF
YOU HAVE A FINALIZER, then you should probably be using the
Unless you peer into the implementation details of your superclasses, you
should assume that all classes may have a finalizer. Unless you don't care
about every
On Jun 24, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Stephen J. Butler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jeff
Laingjeff.la...@spatialinfo.com wrote:
http://www.simple-talk.com/dotnet/.net-framework/understanding-garbage-collection-in-.net/
(Yes, I do .NET as well as Cocoa)
No real surprises there, except
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Peter Ammonpam...@apple.com wrote:
Microsoft even says that all objects must be robust against being Dispose()d
multiple times, which smacks of sloppiness. If your program disposes of an
object twice, then it is structured so that independent usages of the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Jeff Laingjeff.la...@spatialinfo.com wrote:
Unless you peer into the implementation details of your superclasses, you
should assume that all classes may have a finalizer. Unless you don't care
about every last little piece of performance.
I don't understand
On Jun 24, 2009, at 18:19, Jeff Laing wrote:
Unless you peer into the implementation details of your
superclasses, you should assume that all classes may have a
finalizer. Unless you don't care about every last little piece of
performance.
In my day app, we regularly cache hundreds of
On Jun 24, 2009, at 18:19, Jeff Laing wrote:
we regularly cache hundreds of thousands of objects from a persistent
(relational) store and it is absolutely critical to us that the instant that
those objects aren't required, they give their
memory back - that's how we can run in a machine
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:00 , Bill Bumgarner wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Quincey Morris wrote:
In a nutshell, for folks like me who regularly use CFCreate …
CFRelease in loops, what are the benefits of GC?
If CFCreate/CFRelease is precisely what you want to do, there are
no
On Jun 24, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Marcel Weiher wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:00 , Bill Bumgarner wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Quincey Morris wrote:
In a nutshell, for folks like me who regularly use CFCreate …
CFRelease in loops, what are the benefits of GC?
If CFCreate/CFRelease is
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
