There' s a good reason to enforce the 99 cent rule. Imagine a scenario
in which a user downloads an app that is advertised as free, only to
find that it's crippled beyond use without a subscription to a service
or an internal upgrade. That's no way to build trust in the App Store.
Yes,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Harry Jordancocoaha...@googlemail.com wrote:
There' s a good reason to enforce the 99 cent rule. Imagine a scenario in
which a user downloads an app that is advertised as free, only to find that
it's crippled beyond use without a subscription to a service or an
Are apps that are offered for free not allowed to use the store kit?
It seems foolish to have an app the requires a subscription that is
not a free download.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests
Free apps cannot use in-app purchase. You must charge at least 99 cents.
Luke
On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Development wrote:
Are apps that are offered for free not allowed to use the store kit?
It seems foolish to have an app the requires a subscription that is
not a free download.
Wow. that really needs to change. Subscription services or what not
cant use the store then since most of those are free downloads. Ah
well. Back to paypal.
On Aug 31, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Luke the Hiesterman wrote:
Free apps cannot use in-app purchase. You must charge at least 99
cents.
