Thank you Charles and Roland for pointing out that section of documentation,
and correcting in detail my mis-advice in the first reply. Going back to what
Kyle replied to me originally:
Can't you simply set translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints = NO on the
views in question? Then you
On 16 Aug 2014, at 4:10 pm, Kyle Sluder k...@ksluder.com wrote:
Not sure if you’ve got this backwards, or are unaware of a certain frameworks
bug.
Views whose translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints property is set to YES
can be positioned via -setFrame:. Views whose property is set to
On 18 Aug 2014, at 7:18 am, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
On 16 Aug 2014, at 4:10 pm, Kyle Sluder k...@ksluder.com wrote:
Not sure if you’ve got this backwards, or are unaware of a certain
frameworks bug.
Views whose translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints property is
.. and I finally found the one piece of the autolayout adoption guide which
made me think back in the day I could use setFrame: and it would all work
nicely.
On Aug 17, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Roland King r...@rols.org wrote:
.. and I finally found the one piece of the autolayout adoption guide which
made me think back in the day I could use setFrame: and it would all work
nicely.
On 18 Aug 2014, at 9:10 am, Charles Srstka cocoa...@charlessoft.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Roland King r...@rols.org
mailto:r...@rols.org wrote:
.. and I finally found the one piece of the autolayout adoption guide which
made me think back in the day I could use setFrame:
On Aug 17, 2014, at 8:39 PM, Roland King r...@rols.org wrote:
On 18 Aug 2014, at 9:10 am, Charles Srstka cocoa...@charlessoft.com wrote:
On Aug 17, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Roland King r...@rols.org wrote:
.. and I finally found the one piece of the autolayout adoption guide which
made me
On Aug 15, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Ben Kennedy b...@zygoat.ca wrote:
On 15 Aug 2014, at 8:17 pm, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
What I really want is that part of my view hierarchy to be free to use
-setFrame:, but other parts use the autolayout constraints normally.
Can't you
On Aug 16, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kyle Sluder k...@ksluder.com wrote:
On Aug 15, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Ben Kennedy b...@zygoat.ca wrote:
On 15 Aug 2014, at 8:17 pm, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
What I really want is that part of my view hierarchy to be free to use
-setFrame:, but
On 15 Aug 2014, at 04:55, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
I ask because I'm having trouble getting part of my interface working with
autolayout, though other parts work fine. Since the part that doesn't work
works just fine with struts-and-springs, and has done for a long time, I'm
On 15 Aug 2014, at 7:39 pm, Jonathan Mitchell jonat...@mugginsoft.com wrote:
On 15 Aug 2014, at 04:55, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
I ask because I'm having trouble getting part of my interface working with
autolayout, though other parts work fine. Since the part that doesn't
On 15 Aug 2014, at 8:17 pm, Graham Cox graham@bigpond.com wrote:
What I really want is that part of my view hierarchy to be free to use
-setFrame:, but other parts use the autolayout constraints normally.
Can't you simply set translatesAutoresizingMaskIntoConstraints = NO on the
views
What level are constraints implemented at? Are they per window, or more
fine-grained?
I ask because I'm having trouble getting part of my interface working with
autolayout, though other parts work fine. Since the part that doesn't work
works just fine with struts-and-springs, and has done for
13 matches
Mail list logo
