On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:12:13 -0500, Steve Cronin
said:
>I didn't add the binding because I only want to add bindings when I
>understand the value of doing so.
I was commenting on your comment ("no binding", you said, so I said "why
not?"). Bindings are just a fancy way of assigning a value to som
Matt;
Thanks that did the trick!
I didn't add the binding because I only want to add bindings when I
understand the value of doing so.
In this case the table column headers all performed their various
sorts as expected without the bindings - hence no bound sortDescriptors.
Adding the bindi
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:00:59 -0500, Steve Cronin
said:
>Folks;
>
>I have a simple one column tableView of a managed object.
>The text field in the table view is editable.
>I want to keep the table sorted when the user manually changes a value,
> //there is NO binding to a sortDesctiptor
Why not?
Folks;
I have a simple one column tableView of a managed object.
The text field in the table view is editable.
I want to keep the table sorted when the user manually changes a value,
I have registered for the notification:
[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] addObserver:self
selector:@selec