On Dec 25, 2008, at 18:52, christophe mckeon gonzalez de leon wrote:
please pardon the rambling, but i'm just trying to
wrap my head around the semantics involved here.
I think it's simpler than you're assuming it to be. All
processPendingChanges does (as far as undo is concerned) is to hand
thanks for the pointer.
please pardon the rambling, but i'm just trying to
wrap my head around the semantics involved here.
according to Quincey Morris who answered
your question, the way that apple has it in
their tutorial:
dur (disable undo registration)
mmoc (somehow mutate managed object con
I asked almost the same question a couple months ago. Read the
replies to this:
http://www.cocoabuilder.com/archive/message/cocoa/2008/10/25/220970
and let us know if that does not answer your question.
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.
hi,
in the NSPersistentDocument Core Data tutorial, apple includes
the below code. my question is whether there should not also
be another call to processPendingChanges before the call
to disableUndoRegistration? i have seen several examples
of code online which do call it twice, and it would seem
