RE: RE: Deploying Cocoon as WAR in Bea WLS 6.1 SP2

2002-06-21 Thread Matthew Langham
>> The problem which i faced trying and failing to deploy the war version into WLSX.Y was the getRealsPath() calls inside of Cocoon, if that has been fixed inside of Cocoon I see good chances to deploy the WAR successfully in WLS >> Carsten isnt here until Monday - so can anyone confirm this - or

RE: [RT] Flowscript [was Re: [RT] Flowmaps]

2002-06-21 Thread Piroumian Konstantin
> From: Ovidiu Predescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On 6/18/02 8:35 AM, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > > [...] > > >> 1. Stefano points out that flowmaps (I don't really like > this term, a "map" > >> is more appropriate for state machines, how a

Jelly as a possible template or business language (was [RT] SpitScript and [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread James Strachan
With recent talk of flow scripts and declarative business languages I thought I'd briefly introduce Jelly to the list. I'm really interested in hearing anyones thoughts on the applicability of Jelly to the flow / template / business language discussions. OK here goes... Jelly is a simple, lightwe

Re: How to write applications with flowscripts (WAS Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > On 6/20/02 1:06 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > It may actually be better if we have a separate section in the sitemap for > such scripts that implement business logic. This would help in separating > what is business logic and what are flow sc

Re: Jelly as a possible template or business language (was [RT] SpitScriptand [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ... >> RT about a business logic definition system that has >>these goals: >> >>1. has a quick write-test-correct cycle, ie not to be compiled >>2. is easy to write and understand >>3. is modular >>4. will make flowscript a solution to a problem,

RE: [PROPOSAL] Sources, the next generation RE: Speedup *DirectoryGenerator(fwd)

2002-06-21 Thread Stephan Michels
To bring the discussion back to the cocoon-dev list ;-) -- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:34:16 +0200 From: Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Stephan Michels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Steven Noels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Sources, the nex

Re: Jelly as a possible template or business language (was [RT] SpitScript and [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread James Strachan
From: "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > >> RT about a business logic definition system that has > >>these goals: > >> > >>1. has a quick write-test-correct cycle, ie not to be compiled > >>2. is easy to write and understand > >>3.

RE: Jelly as a possible template or business language (was [RT] SpitScript and [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > >> RT about a business logic definition system that has > >>these goals: > >> > >>1. has a quick write-test-correct cycle, ie not to be compiled > >>2. is easy to write and underst

RE: JAAS support in Cocoon

2002-06-21 Thread Nick Airey
That's interesting. If I understand you, you are running tomcat4.0.4b2 standalone - ie. not the jboss/tomcat bundle, and you have JAAS working. I haven't been able to do this. What is the trick in getting tomcat & jboss exchanging principal information? (sorry that this is not a specifically coc

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > >>> Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >>> > Oh god no...businesslogic in javascript.. . no no no. I'm having > nightmares > ... > > >> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >> > >>> Maybe, could you just help me come up with a business-logic stuff > >>> that isn't writte

RE: [PROPOSAL] Sources, the next generation RE: Speedup *DirectoryGenerator

2002-06-21 Thread Stephan Michels
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Marc Portier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a question, which implementation do you like more? > > > > BrowseableSource: > > > > SourceList getChildSources() > > > > SourceList: > > > > Source getSource(int index) > > intgetSourceCount(); > > > > or > > > > Brows

RE: cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/scratchpad/src/org/apache/cocoon/generation SourceDescriptionGenerator.java RepositorySourceDescriptionGenerator.java SlideCollectionGenerator.java

2002-06-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ... > > + > + Changes the design from the SourceRepository. Removed the > SourceDescriptor. > + > + > + Add some proposed interfaces for the excalibur source class: > + http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10117] New: - Problem resolving href for XSLT document("")

2002-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: xml-cocoon2 changes.xml

2002-06-21 Thread stephan
stephan 2002/06/21 07:15:13 Modified:.changes.xml Log: Entries removed by a hint from Vadim Gritsenko. The last entries will confuse the people ;-) Revision ChangesPath 1.194 +1 -11 xml-cocoon2/changes.xml Index: changes.xml =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10117] - Problem resolving href for XSLT document("")

2002-06-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

2002-06-21 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >>Ok, let's start this really /proactive/ (I love this word, it just fills >>one's mouth ;-) RT about a business logic definition system that has >>these goals: >> >>1. has a quick write-test-correct cycle, ie not to be compiled >>2. is easy

encoding 8859-15 strings with cocoon 2.x

2002-06-21 Thread Eric Basley
Hi, I need to manipulate 8859-15 encoding strings (euro symbol), extract from backend servers, within xsl stylesheets, and it's impossible to declare such an encoding for stysheets (serializers re setup with 8858-15 encodng) . Only 8859-1 encoding is allowed, so euro carac are translated in inte

Re: [RT] Flowscript [was Re: [RT] Flowmaps]

2002-06-21 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
On 6/20/02 1:21 AM, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ovidiu Predescu wrote: > >> I think the idea is to have something which just works by default, with no >> configuration necessary. In addition to this, more experienced developers >> can use the current method, which is more co

cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/faq faq-transformers.xml

2002-06-21 Thread shannon
shannon 2002/06/21 15:52:10 Modified:src/documentation/xdocs/faq faq-transformers.xml Log: Added new faq regarding the differences between XInclude and CInclude Transformers with feedback from Vadim. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +38 -0 xml-cocoon2/src/documenta

cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/faq faq-transformers.xml

2002-06-21 Thread shannon
shannon 2002/06/21 15:55:21 Modified:src/documentation/xdocs/faq Tag: cocoon_2_0_3_branch faq-transformers.xml Log: Added new FAQ on the differences between the XInclude and CInclude Transformers with feedback from Vadim. Revision ChangesPath

asp? chilisoft/iASP

2002-06-21 Thread Geoff Howard
Has anyone ever looked, had success with or know if it's possble to use ASP/VBScript for generators? I've seen Chilisoft's engine that may hold promise crossplatform, and there may be other ways to make it work on Windows. For the record, I'm not a fan of these technologies, just trying to find

Re: [RT] Flowmaps

2002-06-21 Thread Steven Noels
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Oh god no...businesslogic in javascript.. . no no no. I'm having > nightmeres of "Sr. Application Developer"s (with emphasis on the > quotes) writing nightmere webapps with "businesslogic" sprinkled > throughout in this "flowmap" as one big huge jumble of spaghetti.