cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs who.xml

cziegeler2002/06/23 23:45:04 Modified:src/documentation/xdocs who.xml Log: My first action of the day: I'm back - and, sorry, Sylvain, I'm the last in the alphabetical list... Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +1 -1 xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/who.xml Ind

cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs who.xml

cziegeler2002/06/23 23:44:53 Modified:src/documentation/xdocs Tag: cocoon_2_0_3_branch who.xml Log: My first action of the day: I'm back - and, sorry, Sylvain, I'm the last in the alphabetical list... Revision ChangesPath No revision No

RE: [RT] WebServicesProxy Generator

Hi Ivelin, I think a component like this is a natural addition to Cocoon and the portal. It's been talked about several times before and it's great to see you starting to work on it. >> Fire and Ice welcome ;) << How can I select which parameters to pass to the Webservice? From your example it l

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

Luca Morandini wrote: > Nicola, > > for all our abstractions and wondereful paper machines, the naked truth is > that the web is geared toward presenting documents, not implementing > applications. And X is for displaying graphics, not running apps. But Cocoon is not as an X server, it does cr

[RT] WebServicesProxy Generator

Following is an initial draft of a new component I am starting to work on. Fire and Ice welcome ;) The WebServiceProxy Cocoon generator is intended to: 1) Allow easy syndication of dynamic content as a natural extension

Re: HELP! Urgently needed help on head

On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:56:48PM +0200, Per-Olof Norén wrote: > Hello all, > I have a problem I can´t find a place to start looking for the solution: > My config is like the following: > > win2k (2*1,1 ghz 1 Gb RAM 50Gb Hdd) > sun jdk1.3.1_02 > resin 2.0.5 > freshly checked out head, compiled

Re: [RT] Flowmaps

Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Christian Haul wrote: >> a) reference to the sitemap's component manager in flow. I have found >> two possibilities, either extending some routines' signatures (many >> modifications) or placing it into the Environment. But I seem not to >> find the place where it is c

RE: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

Nicola, for all our abstractions and wondereful paper machines, the naked truth is that the web is geared toward presenting documents, not implementing applications. The page structure of HTML has nothing to do with Business Object or Business Rules or other abstractions... but we should deal wi

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

http://research.sun.com/features/ace/ This is an example of a business object: http://research.sun.com/features/ace/images/ace_graphic1_lg.jpg And this of a Business Process. http://research.sun.com/features/ace/images/ace_graphic2_lg.jpg Looking at the business process diagram, where

cvs commit: xml-cocoon2/src/documentation/xdocs/drafts sitemap-2.1-draft.xsd

kpiroumian2002/06/23 14:23:49 Modified:src/documentation/xdocs/drafts sitemap-2.1-draft.xsd Log: Fixed several incorrections, thanks to Bruno Dumon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: - added missing attributes to map:act, map:redirect-to, map:mount and map:part - somewhat corrected the pi

Re: [RT] Flowmaps

Christian Haul wrote: > Christian Haul wrote: > >> Anyway, given that we are going to be able to use input modules in >> the sitemap through "{modulename:parameter}" it would be great if it >> would be the same for the flow. >> >> Just another thought (I'm not yet up to speed with the flow so ign

RE: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > >Ok. Here's my vision: a flowscript is the location where you place your > >flow logic. The flow logic is the collection of instructions that > >indicate how to make the transition from one page to another. > > > >Everything else shouldn't be th

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

> > >Ok. Here's my vision: a flowscript is the location where you place your >flow logic. The flow logic is the collection of instructions that >indicate how to make the transition from one page to another. > >Everything else shouldn't be there. > > So why do you need scripting for that? It se

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

> > > There are yet many doubts to cover from the flowscript stuff that start > > > talking about something else makes less sense ATM, IMHO. > > > > This is one of them. > > Flowmaps are so powerfull that all the stuff that was innapropriate to > > be done in the sitemap (heavy webapps) will aut

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > >>>Let's avoid the usual "let's tackle all problems at once" and let's try >>>to get something hammered down before starting using brain cycles in >>>some other directions. >> >>This is actually part of the hammering down. >>I was talking

Re: XMLForms and Flowmap

"Andrew C. Oliver" wrote: > > I've taken my first crack at this and its undergoing review before I > post it. I dislike both actions and the flowmap. More > specifically principally depending on Javascript. Uh, thanks. I'm sure we'll be able to come up with a much better design with such great

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10159] - doesn't work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10159] - doesn't work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10159] New: - doesn't work

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: [RT] SpitScript - B-Logic that doesn't suck ( Re: [RT] Flowmaps)

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Let's avoid the usual "let's tackle all problems at once" and let's try > > to get something hammered down before starting using brain cycles in > > some other directions. > > This is actually part of the hammering down. > I was talking about definitions (ie what fl