DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10461.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10461.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Folks,
When the incremental-processing attribute of the XSLT-processor is set to
true, the document() XSLT function returns a string and NOT a node-set
(as
it is supposed to do).
Hence, if you want something like:
xsl:copy-of select=document('test.xml')/
to work properly, youd should modify
The dev list is a better place to discuss submitting
patches. I've cc'd this reply there as well.
Geoff Howard
--- Robert Ellis Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I noticed that in the XMLForm example that one could
not hit return and
have a multiline message in the additional notes
ivelin 2002/10/23 06:43:02
Modified:src/webapp/samples/stylesheets/xmlform xmlform2html.xsl
Log:
applied patch by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +5 -4
xml-cocoon2/src/webapp/samples/stylesheets/xmlform/xmlform2html.xsl
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13880.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13880.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tuesday, October 22, 2002, at 05:52 PM, Stephen Ng wrote:
Has this been reported to Xalan developers? I'd really like to move to
Xalan 2.4 because that version of XSLTC appears to have many bug fixes.
I had opened this bug:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7776
but it is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'll clean up my mods submit it as an enhancement on bugzilla.
DOM mods aren't really there yet for loose model.
Can you point me to xdocs?
rob
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Ivelin Ivanov wrote:
Thanks for the fix Robert.
I will apply the textarea fix immediately.
Please submit it and the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13885.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13885.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Moving this to Krysalis, we will eventually post a summary on the
Cocoon list later.
Luca Morandini wrote:
Nicola,
we've tried to use the Transformer included in Wings, but:
1) We weren't able to compile it, due to some jar version mismatch
Hmmm... any clue
crafterm2002/10/23 09:17:25
Modified:src/webapp sitemap.xmap
Log:
Sitemap patch explaining the different pipeline implementations.
PR: Bugzilla#13880
Obtained By: Michael Melhem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.79 +34 -0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13880.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
crafterm2002/10/23 09:27:49
Modified:src/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/pipeline/impl
AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline.java
Log:
AbstractCachingProcessingPipeline logging improvement patch.
PR: Bugzilla#13885
Obtained By: Michael Melhem [EMAIL
crafterm2002/10/23 09:51:36
xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/itext/conf - New directory
--
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
crafterm2002/10/23 09:51:36
xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/itext/java - New directory
--
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
crafterm2002/10/23 09:52:13
xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/itext/java/org - New directory
--
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
crafterm2002/10/23 09:52:22
xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/itext/java/org/apache - New directory
--
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
crafterm2002/10/23 09:52:31
xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/itext/java/org/apache/cocoon - New directory
--
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
crafterm2002/10/23 09:52:40
xml-cocoon2/src/blocks/itext/java/org/apache/cocoon/serialization - New directory
--
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
crafterm2002/10/23 09:56:21
Modified:.module.xml properties.xml
Added: src/blocks/itext/conf itext.xmap
src/blocks/itext/java/org/apache/cocoon/serialization
iTextSerializer.java
Removed:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13892.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13892.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Whilst I now have a sitemap DTD that validates all the existing
sitemaps, it doesn't fail all the examples of invalid pipelines in the
lint sitemap:
!-- Pipeline with no map:generate|read|mount|redirect-to|call is illegal
map:pipeline
map:transform
I have just finished further revisions to the draft sitemap. I shall
upload the new version to bugzilla as you read this.
From the current todo.xml:
[code] For 2.1: Fine-tune the draft Sitemap DTD -
src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities/sitemap-v03.dtd (see internal
comments). Tweak the default sitemaps
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
Vadim == Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vadim PPS If it helps, attached find sitemap DTD which only
Vadim purpose is to allow parsing with validation, but it does
Vadim not have a purpose of validating sitemap...
I'm not sure what you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13904.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13904.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ivelin, please update Bugzilla when you apply a patch.
I just wasted time trying to do it as well.
Also, it is not standard practice to add the author tag
for every person who supplies a patch. We would end up with
files which have more lines with author tags than with code.
I think that the
crossley2002/10/23 18:21:10
Modified:src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities catalog
Added: src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities sitemap-v04.dtd
Removed: src/webapp/WEB-INF/entities sitemap-v02.dtd
Log:
Added the new version of DTD and put an old one in the attic.
Submitted by: Colin
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13892.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13892.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
Vadim == Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vadim PPS If it helps, attached find sitemap DTD which only
Vadim purpose is to allow parsing with validation, but it does
Vadim not have a purpose of validating sitemap...
I'm not sure what you mean
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13881.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://localhost:8080/cocoon/documents/howto/xmlform-wizard/howto-xmlform-wi
zard.html
You can probably add another brief howto for loose models.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Ellis Parrott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:27 AM
Subject: Re:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Robert Koberg wrote:
even if it is about .1% of the general Internet users? There might be an
argument if stats could be provided for the user base, but that does
not seem to
be acceptable. What if you have 0 hits with Nav4? Do you still need
to support
it?
Oh, god,
No, I didn't. But I only tried it once, without looking into the documentation.
Maybe the interface changed or something else.
Before reporting to xalan developers I would ask you Steve (or others too)
to verify that this error is reproducable.
Regards,
Michael
Stephen Ng wrote:
Has this been
Hugo,
the use of an extractor/generator seems to us a little bit convoluted... a
Transformer will sit more confortably in the pipeline. However, in case of
multiple images on the same page, your solution would probably be faster: we
understand there are more ways to skin a cat :)
Another thing:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13915.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi everybody!
Today I received the book of Carsten and Matthew. All day I was reading it.
Nice book! Lots of info about the inside of the Cocoon world.
I buyed it because I needed to know more about the XSP. I thinked this is the
way of the future development of Cocoon. But after reading the
45 matches
Mail list logo
