Hi,
Following my post below, I think the solution should be in RequestWrapper.
Shouldn't getSitemapURI return this.req.getSitemapURI(),
instead of this.environment.getURI() , to be consistent with all the other
methods in the wrapper ?
Thanks,
Amir
-Original Message-
From: Amir Rosen
Hi,
I have just migrated my application to the latest CVS version (xmlforms
requirements). It seems that the sourceresolver handles request parameters
differently.
I have an xml file with the following element in it:
cinclude:include
src=cocoon:/configresources/contact/?xpath=//contact/title/
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14845.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14845.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Michael,
try cinclude:include src=cocoon:/configresources/contact/
select=/contact/title/
Regards,
Reinhard
-Original Message-
From: Michael Homeijer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: 2.1 : cinclude /
Title: JSP problem
Hi All
When i run an jsp file, it kept on producing error :
The org.apache.cocoon.www.sitemap_xmap notifies that org.apache.cocoon.ProcessingException says:
Exception JspGenerator.generate()
More precisely:
org.apache.cocoon.ProcessingException: Exception
Michael Hartle wrote:
* What about Monday, 2. December at 7 o'clock pm ?
As Matthew and Carsten are in Frankfurt one week later, how about moving
it to the 9. December ? This way, they`d be able to come, too. How about
the others ?
Best regards,
Michael Hartle,
Hartle Klug Consulting GmbH
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12975.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
My apologies for my time-travelled earlier email; to prevent this
email from being overlooked, I send it again.
Michael Hartle wrote:
* What about Monday, 2. December at 7 o'clock pm ?
As Matthew and Carsten are in Frankfurt one week later, how about moving
it to the 9. December ? This
As Matthew and Carsten are in Frankfurt one week later, how about moving
it to the 9. December ? This way, they`d be able to come, too. How about
the others ?
Thanks for the consideration :-). Actually we are not in Frankfurt
directly - but should be able to make it there. Schnitzel - yummy
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Michael Hartle wrote:
As Matthew and Carsten are in Frankfurt one week later, how about moving
it to the 9. December ? This way, they`d be able to come, too. How about
the others ?
+1 for me ... I may be able to make it over from the UK that day.
Andrew.
--
Andrew
Ref.:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=103003099208755w=2
Hello everybody,
I try to attach a file (build through a xsp). I have read the threads on that topic
but couldn't figure it out how to attach a file.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=102328352206922w=2
On 22.Nov.2002 -- 12:19 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
The DD could be used to generate javascript code that does the
validation.
. . .
Ok if you're speaking of server-side javascript.
Client-side javascript validations are too risky IMHO except for
pre-validations that cause no harm
Amir Rosen wrote:
Hi,
Following my post below, I think the solution should be in RequestWrapper.
Shouldn't getSitemapURI return this.req.getSitemapURI(),
instead of this.environment.getURI() , to be consistent with all the other
methods in the wrapper ?
Thanks,
Amir
-Original
On 22.Nov.2002 -- 11:43 AM, Christian Haul wrote:
On 21.Nov.2002 -- 11:05 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Q: I want do define a pipeline that will be used only as a
transformation service. Why must I write a map:generate and a
map:serialize in its definition ?
A: Because the sitemap, as
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 14:55, Christian Haul wrote:
. ..what about e.g.
map:pipeline type=transformer name=super_skin
!-- ... --
/map:pipeline
For someone like me who doesn't know a lot about sitemap and pipeline
internals, this looks very logical and understandable.
Logical
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 13:53, Christian Haul wrote:
. . .
Perhaps the very same script could be used both for client side and
server side validation.
Yes, a generated validation script could certainly be used in several ways.
. . .
How about a text-key property on fields, that is used
i'll respond to the rest when i have time, but i *do* want to set the
record straight on one thing. please do get this info to whomever is
appropriate..
Steven Noels wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-usersm=103780260804583w=2
Ken: please don't take the hyperlinked message
Sounds fine with me mate.
Cheers,
Marcus
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 11:45:02AM +0100, Michael Hartle wrote:
My apologies for my time-travelled earlier email; to prevent this
email from being overlooked, I send it again.
Michael Hartle wrote:
* What about Monday, 2. December at 7
I feel this criticism is unjust. MHO. It would probably be next to
impossible to arrange such an event without sponsors, and even more
difficult to land such a sizeable sponsorship without them wanting
something in return. Secondly, we had some clue about what the talk
would be like and no
OTOH, for Xers, it is more interesting to have a whole day of 'X'
instead of some 'X' with some 'Y' interspersed. I believe this was
part of the succes of Gent.
If interesting stuff gets mixed with less interesting stuff (the Xers
will value the Y stuff less, and the other way around),
On 26.Nov.2002 -- 03:25 PM, Marcus Crafter wrote:
Sounds fine with me mate.
Same with me.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
Andrew Savory wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Michael Hartle wrote:
As Matthew and Carsten are in Frankfurt one week later, how about moving
it to the 9. December ? This way, they`d be able to come, too. How about
the others ?
+1 for me ... I may be able to make it over from the UK that day.
Dear all,
I'm writing you to propose that project _Morphos_ be moved inside of
the Cocoon project.
/Ok, but what is it?/
I've recieved requests to:
- use the POI Serializer stuff outside of Cocoon
- use other blocks outside of Cocoon
- have a simple embedabble transformation chain
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[X] +1 I think it's a good idea
[ ] 0 I really don't care.
[ ] -1, I don't think it's a good idea.
Late, but wholeheartedly
Giacomo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Dear all,
I'm writing you to propose that project _Morphos_ be moved inside of
the Cocoon project.
I can't currently see the benefit of this move - as far as I understand it
_Morphos_ has a much wider (or different) scope than Cocoon - so
why should it be part.
I
I can't currently see the benefit of this move - as far as I understand it
_Morphos_ has a much wider (or different) scope than Cocoon - so
why should it be part.
No. Morphos has a much narrower scope and should be a Cocoon block or
set of blocks. For deserializing binary formats as XML
Reinhard,
I think the xpath name of the request parameter was a bit misleading. My
point is that any request parameter is not handed over to the internal
pipeline. So cinclude:include
src=cocoon:/configresources/contact/?par=a/ is the same as
cinclude:include src=cocoon:/configresources/contact//
Hi again Michael and all!
On Friday, Nov 22, 2002, at 04:58 US/Pacific, Michael Melhem wrote:
Hi everyone,
It was great seeing you all in Ghent :)
Yes, it was a lot of fun! Sorry for being late with my replies, I'm
slowly catching up with emails, not only on cocoon-dev. And just when
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Comments and suggestions are very welcome as always :-)
My suggestion is to keep this on stand-by until we have a Cocoon PMC.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Comments and suggestions are very welcome as always :-)
My suggestion is to keep this on stand-by until we have a Cocoon PMC.
sounds logical and fair enough.
-
To
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
i'll respond to the rest when i have time, but i *do* want to set the
record straight on one thing. please do get this info to whomever
is appropriate..
must be me, I guess :-(
Steven Noels wrote:
Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
To be entirely honest with you, I already did this redesign in my head
when I was thinking about how to separate the flow logic from the
sitemap and trying to get rid of actions. I started to think about wild
alternatives, but couldn't find any.
Well, now you have
Stefano, thanks for taking the time to reply in detail. I'm going to snip
most of the discussion to keep this somewhat terse, but do have a couple of
further comments...
small snip
Well, yes mostly it is, but we have a requirement for very dynamic
business logic and very dynamic flow
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Comments and suggestions are very welcome as always :-)
My suggestion is to keep this on stand-by until we have a Cocoon PMC.
+1
In the meantime, since I cast the stone, anyone who is interested can
start looking at the code and
Hi,
When I tried to login (guest,guest) to the sunspotdemo at:
http://localhost:8080/cocoon/sunspotdemo-portal
I get the following:
---
Cocoon 2 - Internal server error
Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
Stefano, thanks for taking the time to reply in detail.
You're welcome. There is much more to learn when somebody is against my
ideas than when people agree with me. :-D
I'm going to snip
most of the discussion to keep this somewhat terse, but do have a couple of
Here is the proposal so far.
o
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with
Stefano,
is there any progress as a result of the voting procedure?
Ivelin
- Original Message -
From: Giacomo Pati [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:01 AM
Subject: RE: [important proposal] Cocoon as official Apache project
From:
Hooray !!!
+1 Stefano for chairman.
- Original Message -
From: Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Apache Cocoon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:58 PM
Subject: [proposal] Board Resolution for the creation of Cocoon PMC
Here is the proposal so far.
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
Flow is designed to simplify the sitemap
by reducing the amount of routing components required and by moving
business logic out of the sitemap. Having global flow script variables
available to routing components might encouarage users to move the
flow/routing control
crossley2002/11/26 22:15:55
Modified:.Tag: cocoon_2_0_3_branch build.xml changes.xml
todo.xml
lib Tag: cocoon_2_0_3_branch jars.xml
Added: legalTag: cocoon_2_0_3_branch LICENSE.jing
lib/optional Tag:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Here is the proposal so far.
...
+1 and of course +1 for Stefano as chair of the PMC
Carsten
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Immer auf dem Laufenden - mit der SMS-Benachrichtigung bei
WEB.DE FreeMail.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Here is the proposal so far.
[...]
+1
Two things to define:
1) the text for the cocoon PMC intentions
Start with a draft we should review because:
2) the person for the chair.
I volunteer for the chair.
+1 you're the chair, of course! Start working! ;-)
--
44 matches
Mail list logo
