Re: [vote] Forrestizing Cocoon and more

2003-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 23 mars 2003, à 14:38 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit : ...This said, here are the actions you should vote: 1) cocoon moves to forrest for its documentation production +1 2) if so, cocoon does it before releasing 2.1 +1 3) if so, I'd like a 'fast-yet-potentially-disrup

Re: [proposal] a new kind of 'dist'

2003-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 23 mars 2003, à 15:25 Europe/Zurich, Stefano Mazzocchi a écrit : ... Before you jump up and down and scream "no, no, binaries are easier for our users", get off your life-without-a-compiler-windows-inflicted-mindset and think that every JDK comes with a compiler. Technically, I'm w

Re: [vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Crossley wrote, On 23/03/2003 14.22: I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer. +1 -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) -

Re: [vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
David Crossley wrote, On 23/03/2003 14.55: I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer. +1 -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-slide

2003-03-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All right. I think I found out the problem: it seems that the gump > descriptor for jakarta-slide is incorrect and doesn't expose all the > jars that we need and we depend on. Quite possible. Slide used to be unbuildable by Gump

Re: [vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 23 mars 2003, à 14:22 Europe/Zurich, David Crossley a écrit : I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer here's my +1 -Bertrand

Re: [vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 23 mars 2003, à 14:55 Europe/Zurich, David Crossley a écrit : I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer. +1 here. -Bertrand

Re: cvs disruption

2003-03-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le Dimanche, 23 mars 2003, à 14:20 Europe/Zurich, David Crossley a écrit : If the mantra "only use released version of a product" was applied by Forrest then we would not be doing very well. We now need, and probably always will need, a recent Cocoon head. Perhaps we can relax this rule for F

[vote] micro-decision for docs: creation of cocoon-docs CVS module

2003-03-23 Thread Steven Noels
In order to get one little step closer to the 'new' document infrastructure, many of us seek clarity whether we should move docs to a separate CVS module or not. The benefits and downfalls are largely known, so let's vote on this and get this issue cleared. My own personal bias: don't forget th

Re: [vote] Forrestizing Cocoon and more

2003-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > This said, here are the actions you should vote: > > 1) cocoon moves to forrest for its documentation production +1 > 2) if so, cocoon does it before releasing 2.1 +1 > 3) if so, I'd like a 'fast-yet-potentially-disruptive' move rather > than a 'slow-yet-car

Re: [proposal] a new kind of 'dist'

2003-03-23 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 24 March 2003 02:08, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 23/03/2003 15.25: > > What do you think? > > +1 for the source distro. I agree, except... > As for the binary distro, we simply never did one really. What I'd like > to see is > >cocoon-full.war no need, I

Re: [vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:55:19AM +1100, David Crossley wrote: > I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer. He has been > involved with Cocoon for the past year, providing lots of > useful discussion and bug report/fixing. He has submitted > many useful patches, for example with the file upload.

Re: [vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:22:36AM +1100, David Crossley wrote: > I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer. +1, welcome --Jeff > > --David Crossley >

Re: [vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Bernhard Huber
from me +1

Re: [vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Bernhard Huber
from me +1

Re: [vote] Forrestizing Cocoon and more

2003-03-23 Thread Bernhard Huber
1) cocoon moves to forrest for its documentation production +1 2) if so, cocoon does it before releasing 2.1 +1 3) if so, I'd like a 'fast-yet-potentially-disruptive' move rather than a 'slow-yet-carefully-planned-not-to-disrupt-anything' one. +1 i think forrest has a lot of pros which

Re: [vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Diana Shannon
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:22 AM, David Crossley wrote: I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer. He has been involved with Cocoon since mid-2000 and more intensely during the past year. +1. I was lucky to meet him in person and can confirm his first-rate ideas and experience. He's offe

Re: [proposal] a new kind of 'dist'

2003-03-23 Thread J.D. Daniels
Well I am just a user... But you hit the nail right on the head there. I had cocoon up and running within minutes the first time I found it, but was extremely frustrated for months afterward, because I could load the samples page... and SEE what it could do, but not be able to implement for myself.

Re: [vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
David Crossley wrote: I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer. Here is my +1 +1. Ciao, -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. http://www.pro-netics.com

Re: [vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
David Crossley wrote: I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer. Here is my obvious +1 Knowing Andrew (and David Casal) IRL I know how much they and their company are committed with Cocoon, so this is my big +1, and the warmest welcome aboard! -- Gianugo Rabellino Pro-netics s.r.l. http://ww

Re: [vote] Forrestizing Cocoon and more

2003-03-23 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 23/03/2003 14.38: ... This said, here are the actions you should vote: WARNING: being a Forrest dev, I'm baised ;-) 1) cocoon moves to forrest for its documentation production Yeah! :-D +1 2) if so, cocoon does it before releasing 2.1 Also +1 3) if so, I'd like a

Re: Cocoon Gump Status

2003-03-23 Thread J.Pietschmann
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: So, what do we do? Good question. a) Fix GUMP so that it can take stuff from a branch. b) Include a Cocoon owned stub. c) Do nothing. In either case, check http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?FOPAvalonization before it goes stale. Send nag mails to Jeremias who pr

Re: [proposal] a new kind of 'dist'

2003-03-23 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 23/03/2003 15.25: ... So, in light of the good old triad ./configure; make; make install I propose to ship Cocoon 2.1 *AS IS*, sort of a cleaned-up version of our current CVS and improve a little the 'INSTALL.txt' doc that will suggest you to do $> ./build.sh $>

Re: Scratchpad PetStore Sample and XMLForm

2003-03-23 Thread leo leonid
On Sonntag, März 23, 2003, at 12:00 Uhr, Christopher Oliver wrote: I modified this sample to use XMLForm to implement the "Edit Account" page of this sample. To see this, first sign in and then click on "My Account". XMLForm is very nice to use in flow scripts, because it automatically popula

Re: Scratchpad PetStore Sample and XMLForm

2003-03-23 Thread leo leonid
On Sonntag, März 23, 2003, at 12:00 Uhr, Christopher Oliver wrote: I modified this sample to use XMLForm to implement the "Edit Account" page of this sample. To see this, first sign in and then click on "My Account". XMLForm is very nice to use in flow scripts, because it automatically popula

Re: [vote] Forrestizing Cocoon and more

2003-03-23 Thread Diana Shannon
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:38 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: 1) cocoon moves to forrest for its documentation production +1 2) if so, cocoon does it before releasing 2.1 +1 3) if so, I'd like a 'fast-yet-potentially-disruptive' move rather than a 'slow-yet-carefully-planned-not-to-disrupt-

Bug report for Cocoon 2 [2003/03/23]

2003-03-23 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Cocoon 1 [2003/03/23]

2003-03-23 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: [vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread Diana Shannon
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 08:55 AM, David Crossley wrote: I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer. He also contributed an excellent tutorial on custom generators. +1 Diana

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-slide

2003-03-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
repare: [echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant v

[proposal] a new kind of 'dist'

2003-03-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
In the beginning, there was only one cocoon distribution, packaged with two different packagers (zip for windows and tar.gz for unix and friends). Then cocoon became very complex and we decided to create a binary distribution to make things easier. Things were indeed easier for new users to ins

[vote] Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread David Crossley
I propose Geoff Howard as Cocoon committer. He has been involved with Cocoon for the past year, providing lots of useful discussion and bug report/fixing. He has submitted many useful patches, for example with the file upload. He gives tremendous assistance on cocoon-users, further demonstrating hi

Antwort: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/web3/lib util.concurrent-1.3.1.jar

2003-03-23 Thread volker . schmitt
excalibur-event also depends on it, so I think this should be part of the core ? Volker stefano 2003/03/23 02:41:01 Added: src/blocks/web3/lib util.concurrent-1.3.1.jar Log: moving Doug Lea's concurrent utility classes to the block that depends on them Revision Changes

Re: Finishing Deprecation Package

2003-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Jeremy Quinn wrote: > OK > > This still fails: > > http://localhost:/samples/catalog/sdocbook-demo > > org.apache.cocoon.ProcessingException: Failed to execute pipeline.: > java.io.FileNotFoundException: > /Users/jermq/Checkouts/Secure/cocoon-2.1/build/webapp/samples/catalog/ > s

[vote] Forrestizing Cocoon and more

2003-03-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
As I think most of the people here knows, Forrest is a Cocoon spin-off project that focuses on static-snapshots of publishing-intensive web sites with complex needs. Cocoon now self-generates its own static website, but given the amount of time/effort/energy that has gone into Forrest since it

[vote] Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer

2003-03-23 Thread David Crossley
I propose Andrew Savory as Cocoon committer. He has been involved with Cocoon since mid-2000 and more intensely during the past year. Browsing the email archives i see plenty of discussion, bug reports, testing, and suggestions. This indicates his commitment. Andrew is also keen on documentation an

Re: cvs disruption

2003-03-23 Thread David Crossley
Diana Shannon wrote: > I'm not saying it isn't working. I'm saying the **only** reason it works > now is because we are using a cvs-based version of an outside project, > not a released version. Stefano recently stated in: >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=104619931816392&w=

Re: cvs disruption

2003-03-23 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Diana Shannon wrote: All right. Since there is circular dependency between cocoon and forrest, I would suggest we release cocoon 2.1 first, allow forrest to release a new version based on 2.1 and at that point forrestize our docs. how does that sound? But this circular dependency will always b

Re: cvs disruption

2003-03-23 Thread Diana Shannon
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 02:59 AM, David Crossley wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Diana Shannon wrote: For example, current forrest build capability with cocoon's cvs is only possible with Forrest CVS, not the last Forrest release. This violates your "building on sand" philosophy. I am no

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-slide

2003-03-23 Thread Gump
[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.6alpha compi

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-mail

2003-03-23 Thread Gump
[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.6alpha compiled on

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-php

2003-03-23 Thread Gump
[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.6alpha compiled on

[GUMP] Project(s) dropped

2003-03-23 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml platform_props: compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rubys/

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-jsp

2003-03-23 Thread Gump
[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.6alpha compiled on

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-fop

2003-03-23 Thread Gump
[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.6alpha compiled on

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-databases

2003-03-23 Thread Gump
[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030323 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.6alpha compi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18131] - The Cocoon Servlet does not shutdown properly under Tomcat

2003-03-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: cocoon-2.1/src/documentation/xdocs/ctwig/sample/transformations/basic03 basic03-01.xml basic03-01.xml.ignore

2003-03-23 Thread Jeff Turner
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:27:03PM +1100, David Crossley wrote: > Jeff Turner wrote: > > Stephan Michels wrote: > > ... > > > No, I mean not ignoring for the validation, I mean ignoring for the > > > documentation generation process. > > > > Yes, should be possible by defining 'project.sitemap-dir