release notes tidy-up and announcement.xsl

The announcement.xml file was including the file changes.xml So now the announcement is busted. We could get it to use the new status.xml instead. However ... Do we really want to dump the whole release notes out with an announcement? There may be too many when 2.1 is announced. There are about 21

Re: WYSIWYG XML editing in the new OpenOffice beta

Thanks Gianugo that did it. Don - Original Message - From: "Gianugo Rabellino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 8:23 AM Subject: Re: WYSIWYG XML editing in the new OpenOffice beta Don Saxton wrote: > Hmm... > I don' see a patch on the bugzilla pa

use status.xml instead of changes/todo

One more microstep for Forrest ... Please use status.xml for the changes and todo items. --David

RE: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language

... > -Original Message- > From: Geoff Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language > Not trying to be cynical, just pointing out that it's not just > making a good > t

Issues with chaperon

We were very picky with Ivelin and his move to factor out xmlform, but I'm going to be as well with Chaperon. There are few things that I don't like: 1) copyright is given to the ASF. While I *do* appreciate the intention, the ASF's policy cannot allow this (I'm going to be picky on those things

Re: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language

Once we cull transform from layout (template), I can't say who likes what language matters. Layout is a visual and aural art. They are what you see and hear, so wysiwyg is the natural language. I am surprised at the scarcity of wysiwyg template programs. Even macromedia, who owns a server solution

Re: WYSIWYG XML editing in the new OpenOffice beta

Don Saxton wrote: Hmm... I don' see a patch on the bugzilla page and I don't see the Docbook on the save as... OO does say it is 1.1 beta ??? It's still working for me. Go to http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12712 and download from there http://www.openoffice.org/issues/showatta

RE: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language

> -Original Message- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 9:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RT] the quest for the perfect template language > > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote, On 03/04/2003 13.12:

Re: WYSIWYG XML editing in the new OpenOffice beta

Hmm... I don' see a patch on the bugzilla page and I don't see the Docbook on the save as... OO does say it is 1.1 beta ??? Don - Original Message - From: "Gianugo Rabellino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 10:20 PM Subject: Re: WYSIWYG XML edi

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-scratchpad

[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030405 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-slide

[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030405 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-fop

[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030405 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-mail

[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030405 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.

[GUMP] Build Failure - cocoon-block-php

[echo] +---+ [echo] Apache Cocoon 20030405 [1999-2003] [echo] +---+ [echo] Building with Apache Ant version 1.