RE: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > "Theodore W. Leung" wrote: > > > > > > Can anyone in cocoon verify the origin of this jar. If we can't, we'll > > > have to remove it from CVS. > > > > Let's remove it. xml-cocoon is a dead tree anyway. > >

Re: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-07 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > "Theodore W. Leung" wrote: > > > > > > Can anyone in cocoon verify the origin of this jar. If we can't, we'll > > > have to remove it from CVS. > > > > Let's remove it. xml-cocoon is a dead tree anyway. > > > > Anybody against this? >

RE: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > "Theodore W. Leung" wrote: > > > > Can anyone in cocoon verify the origin of this jar. If we can't, we'll > > have to remove it from CVS. > > Let's remove it. xml-cocoon is a dead tree anyway. > > Anybody against this? > > Ah, BTW, we should move xml-cocoon2 over

Re: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
"Theodore W. Leung" wrote: > > Can anyone in cocoon verify the origin of this jar. If we can't, we'll > have to remove it from CVS. Let's remove it. xml-cocoon is a dead tree anyway. Anybody against this? Ah, BTW, we should move xml-cocoon2 over to xml-cocoon one of these days, don't you thin

Re: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Theodore W. Leung
Can anyone in cocoon verify the origin of this jar. If we can't, we'll have to remove it from CVS. Ted On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 15:56, Theodore W. Leung wrote: > The only commit of the jar was by greenrd, Robin Green. > > Robin, can you tell us if you are the sole author of the bugfix? If so, >

Re: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-04 Thread Theodore W. Leung
The only commit of the jar was by greenrd, Robin Green. Robin, can you tell us if you are the sole author of the bugfix? If so, could you please check in the file referenced in the message below so that we can be clear? Thanks, Ted On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 15:35, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >

Re: [3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-04 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On 4 Feb 2002, Theodore W. Leung wrote: > The jar sax-bugfix contains a single class SAXException. This jar > exists only in xml-cocoon/lib. > > This appears to be a single bugfix to SAX. Do we know who did it - that is your authority to talk to. > Since SAX is under a no-warranty no-copyrig

[3rd party jar] sax-bugfix

2002-02-04 Thread Theodore W. Leung
The jar sax-bugfix contains a single class SAXException. This jar exists only in xml-cocoon/lib. This appears to be a single bugfix to SAX. Since SAX is under a no-warranty no-copyright license, I don't think that much needs to happen here. To really be uptight, we could check in a copy of h