Dims,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:44:38 -0700 (PDT), Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you be posting SOAP/UDDI LogicSheets? (soon?). Do you need
> anymore changes?
Sorry I didn't have a chance to reply to this one, I was in vacation
until September 10th, and you email got lost in a
Ovidiu,
Will you be posting SOAP/UDDI LogicSheets? (soon?). Do you need anymore changes?
Thanks,
dims
> Hi Dims,
>
> This sounds great! I'll go ahead and do the work, test it and then
> post the patches.
>
> Thanks,
> Ovidiu
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:56:32 -0700 (PDT), Davanum Srinivas <[EMA
> I wonder if there will be some problems with the 2 toSAX() methods
> considering that XMLConsumer extends ContentHandler, and that most
> often, an XMLConsumer is stored in separate ContentHandler and
> LexicalHandler variables, meaning you no longer have an XMLConsumer
> variable.
>
> Sinc
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:06:31 +0200, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
>>
>>>Sylvain,
>>>
>>>On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:52:25 +0200, Sylvain Wallez
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>public interface XMLFragment
>{
> v
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:06:31 +0200, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> > Sylvain,
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:52:25 +0200, Sylvain Wallez
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>public interface XMLFragment
> >>>{
> >>> void toSAX(ContentHandler handler
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> Sylvain,
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:52:25 +0200, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>>public interface XMLFragment
>>>{
>>> void toSAX(ContentHandler handler) throws SAXException;
>>> void toSAX(XMLConsumer consumer) throws SAXException;
>>> void toDOM(
Sylvain,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:52:25 +0200, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > public interface XMLFragment
> > {
> > void toSAX(ContentHandler handler) throws SAXException;
> > void toSAX(XMLConsumer consumer) throws SAXException;
> > void toDOM(Node node) throws Exception;
>
Hi Dims,
This sounds great! I'll go ahead and do the work, test it and then
post the patches.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:56:32 -0700 (PDT), Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ovidiu,
>
> Sounds Great! Since no one objected.Please go ahead and submit patches
>aga
Ovidiu,
Sounds Great! Since no one objected.Please go ahead and submit patches against
C2.1. I
will try to get them in. Please post zip files (with diff's and new files) directly to
cocoon-dev
as usual.
Thanks,
dims
PS: If there are problems with zip files, then you can upload them t
Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
>
> Hi Carsten,
>
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:07:08 +0200, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> > >
> > > I was looking at how the current Source interface is defined, and I
> > > believe we need to separate things a little bit mor
Hi Carsten,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:07:08 +0200, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> >
> > I was looking at how the current Source interface is defined, and I
> > believe we need to separate things a little bit more. I badly need
> > this separation in one
> Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at how the current Source interface is defined, and I
> believe we need to separate things a little bit more. I badly need
> this separation in one of the extensions to Cocoon I'm working on
> (which I hope to present sometime early next month).
Hi,
I was looking at how the current Source interface is defined, and I
believe we need to separate things a little bit more. I badly need
this separation in one of the extensions to Cocoon I'm working on
(which I hope to present sometime early next month).
There are three distinct things the So
13 matches
Mail list logo
