Re: [PATCH] nag on prereq failures
Sam Ruby wrote: I could be a smartass, and commit this patch, but figured that it merits further discussion. It *might* be worth committing the first block of the patch, however. Go ahead. +1 -- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pluralitas non est ponenda si
[PATCH] nag on prereq failures
I could be a smartass, and commit this patch, but figured that it merits further discussion. It *might* be worth committing the first block of the patch, however. - Sam Ruby Index: gump.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-cocoon2/gump.x