Konstantin Piroumian wrote:
>>From: Ivelin Ivanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>>+1
>>
>>
>>I'm also a bit confused by the cocoon:
>>proto. Isn't there more to it than just forward?
>>
Nothing more !
>>The parameters to forward are request attributes correct?
>>You can't add request parameters
. You can't add parameters, but you can call
an URL with new parameters: 'show-page.xml?page=success'.
Is it possible with the current sitemap implementations?
Konstantin
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 11:59 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> See this simple case:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As you see there is no need for a flowmap and there is no need for a
>> resource usage.
>
> In this case, there is no need for an
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:47 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward
> Hi, team!
>
> I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap.
> Behavior should be the same as .
> As redirect and forward are absol
Konstantin Piroumian wrote:
>Hi, team!
>
>I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap.
>Behavior should be the same as .
>As redirect and forward are absolutely different in servlet environment then
>it would be better to have separate elements for them. I'd leave
> for real redirects (with 302
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > You like declarative? Then try to make a charting stylesheet
> > > in xsl like
> > > brother John did, and we will see if you still like it ;-P
> >
> > Hey! Don't bring me into this! ;)
>
From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You like declarative? Then try to make a charting stylesheet
> > in xsl like
> > brother John did, and we will see if you still like it ;-P
>
> Hey! Don't bring me into this! ;)
>
> I enjoyed doing those xslt's :)
:-)
I've also seen 3D charts done
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Ok, then can someone please explain me what resources are for?
> >
> > Is it possible to use actions inside of a resource? If no
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> See this simple case:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> As you see there is no need for a flowmap and there is no need for a
> resource usage.
In this case, there is no need for an internal redirect.
All web servers usually redirect the browser in this case.
> You like declarative? Then try to make a charting stylesheet
> in xsl like
> brother John did, and we will see if you still like it ;-P
Hey! Don't bring me into this! ;)
I enjoyed doing those xslt's :)
BTW - I can see the use of internal redirects and the
portal code makes *heavy* use of it
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Ok, then can someone please explain me what resources are for?
>
> Is it possible to use actions inside of a resource? If no then with
> you'll have that possibilty. If yes, then I don't
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
>
> The flowmap will eliminate needs for redirects, like whiles
> an
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'd like to propose to add a node
> > > to sitemap.
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> > > I'd like to propose to add a node
> > to sitemap.
> > > Behavior should be the same as > uri="cocoon:/..." />.
> >
> >
On Tuesday, April 9, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap.
>> Behavior should be the same as .
>
> What's different from current map:call ?
>
>
>
>
I can see value in a more explicit facility for redirecting
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
> > I'd like to propose to add a node
> to sitemap.
> > Behavior should be the same as uri="cocoon:/..." />.
>
> What's different from current map:call ?
>
>
>
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap.
> Behavior should be the same as .
What's different from current map:call ?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, s
Hi, team!
I'd like to propose to add a node to sitemap.
Behavior should be the same as .
As redirect and forward are absolutely different in servlet environment then
it would be better to have separate elements for them. I'd leave
for real redirects (with 302 status code) and use
for all inter
18 matches
Mail list logo
