On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 06:17 US/Pacific, Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
+1
Bruno is doing an excellent job and is a very nice guy!
Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
+1
--David
Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
Looks like I blogged about it before I voted, so here's my belated +1.
It's funny: any time I think about propo
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Michael Melhem wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:17:49PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> > coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> > shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
> >
> > Votes...?
> >
>
Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
And yet another +1 !
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
ht
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 09:17 AM, Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
+1
Diana
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 02:17 PM, Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
regards Jeremy
On 26.Feb.2003 -- 02:17 PM, Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
+1
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 17:15, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Brian said with the last ids he set out that he prefers more unique ids.
> Nick Chalko asked for a short one (was it nick, or chalko...) and Brian
> made [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Maybe giving a backup id may be better, if you don't want to see
Bruno Dumon wrote, On 26/02/2003 17.11:
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 16:58, Morrison, John wrote:
[...]
You're welcome. Will give this till tomorrow morning to let
other people express any opinions, then I'll email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(anyone else?) and get you a username. Is bruno ok?
yes, that's fine.
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 16:58, Morrison, John wrote:
[...]
> You're welcome. Will give this till tomorrow morning to let
> other people express any opinions, then I'll email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (anyone else?) and get you a username. Is bruno ok?
yes, that's fine.
--
Bruno Dumon
> From: Bruno Dumon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 15:17, Morrison, John wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> > coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> > shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
> >
> > Votes...?
>
> +1 from me
On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 15:17, Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
+1 from me too :-)
Thanks for the nomination, John, and all of you for
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:17:49PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
+1, welcome Bruno :)
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.
A little bit late, but anyway:
+1
--
Konstantin
From: "Morrison, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
>
> +1
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
>
> +1
>
+1
Bruno get's my chair :-). Couldn't think of anyone better. Have fun.
Matthew
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:17:49PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
>
> +1
+1
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
--
Torsten
Morrison, John wrote, On 26/02/2003 15.17:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant,
Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
+1
--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine
Stephan Michels wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
+1, and I will also thank Bruno for help improving the
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
>
> +1
+1, and I will also thank Bruno for help improving the profiler
componen
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 02:17:49PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
+1
--Jeff
>
> Votes...?
>
> +1
Morrison, John wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
> coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
> shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
>
> Votes...?
>
+1
Carsten
Morrison, John wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
I was about to propose the same thing. +1 here.
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l.
http://www.pro-net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be doing an awful lot of
coding atm, his patches look good and I can't see why he
shouldn't be allowed to commit them himself!
Votes...?
+1
===
Information in this email and any attachments are confid
26 matches
Mail list logo
