> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Is there any interest in integrating Cocoon with pizza Java
Compiler?
> > http://pizzacompiler.sourceforge.net
> >
> > My observations about it so far are:
> > 1. Compiled byte code is almost iden
> From: Sylvain Wallez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> >All,
> >
> >Is there any interest in integrating Cocoon with pizza Java Compiler?
> >http://pizzacompiler.sourceforge.net
> >
> >My observations about it so far are:
> >1. Compiled byte code is almost identical to
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> > From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > > Ok,
> > >
> > > sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
> > > become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
> >
> > The la
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Is there any interest in integrating Cocoon with pizza Java Compiler?
> http://pizzacompiler.sourceforge.net
>
> My observations about it so far are:
> 1. Compiled byte code is almost identical to Sun's compiler output.
> 2. It is 450 Kb in size, comparing wi
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> > From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > > Ok,
> > >
> > > sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
> > > become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generati
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>All,
>
>Is there any interest in integrating Cocoon with pizza Java Compiler?
>http://pizzacompiler.sourceforge.net
>
>My observations about it so far are:
>1. Compiled byte code is almost identical to Sun's compiler output.
>2. It is 450 Kb in size, comparing with 4.7Mb o
Vadim,
>Is there any interest in integrating Cocoon with pizza Java Compiler?
>http://pizzacompiler.sourceforge.net
Never heared of that...
>My observations about it so far are:
>1. Compiled byte code is almost identical to Sun's compiler output.
>2. It is 450 Kb in size, comparing with 4.7Mb o
All,
Is there any interest in integrating Cocoon with pizza Java Compiler?
http://pizzacompiler.sourceforge.net
My observations about it so far are:
1. Compiled byte code is almost identical to Sun's compiler output.
2. It is 450 Kb in size, comparing with 4.7Mb of javac.
3. Startup time is fast
> From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> > Ok,
> >
> > sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
> > become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
>
> The last major rewrite has introduced a boost in
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Ok,
>
> sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
> become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
The last major rewrite has introduced a boost in slownes.
> Clearly, developping on cocoon with 20 seconds del
On Thu, 07 Feb 2002 09:46:58 -0500, Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> >>>Moreover, I'd love to be able to decide what to use (interpreted or
> >>>compiled) from cocoon.xconf or, in case the treeprocessor ends
> >>>
> > up
> >
> >>>faster all the time, si
Jason Foster wrote:
>
>
>> Just to make things clear : sitemap is only one of the possible uses
>> of the TreeProcessor : it's a generic framework for implementing
>> pipeline assembly languages (hence "Processor") with an evaluation
>> tree (hence "Tree").
>>
>> The supported languages are d
> From: Jason Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
>
> > Just to make things clear : sitemap is only one of the possible uses
of
> > the TreeProcessor : it's a generic framework for implementing
pipeline
> > assembly languages (hence "Processor") with an evaluation tree
(hence
> > "Tree").
> >
> Just to make things clear : sitemap is only one of the possible uses of
> the TreeProcessor : it's a generic framework for implementing pipeline
> assembly languages (hence "Processor") with an evaluation tree (hence
> "Tree").
>
> The supported languages are defined in treeprocessor.xconf
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Ok,
>
>sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
>become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
>
>Clearly, developping on cocoon with 20 seconds delays between changes is
>a nightmare and would scare people away instantly.
>
>Now
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>>>Moreover, I'd love to be able to decide what to use (interpreted or
>>>compiled) from cocoon.xconf or, in case the treeprocessor ends
>>>
> up
>
>>>faster all the time, simply blast the compiled version and get rid
>>>
> of
>
>>>that stupid javac!
>>>
>>+1
I like
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > Ok,
> >
> > Now that we have a functional interpreted sitemap engine, I
> > suggest we
> > move this on the main trunk and keep improving on it from there.
> +1
+1
> > Also, I would like to propose a name change: TreeProcessor isn't
> >
> Ok,
>
> Now that we have a functional interpreted sitemap engine, I
> suggest we
> move this on the main trunk and keep improving on it from there.
+1
>
> Also, I would like to propose a name change: TreeProcessor isn't
> exactlyself-explanatory as a 'sitemap interpreter'.
+1
>
> Moreov
> Ok,
>
> sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
> become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
>
> Clearly, developping on cocoon with 20 seconds delays between changes is
> a nightmare and would scare people away instantly.
>
> Now that we have a funct
efano
MazzocchiTo: Apache Cocoon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [vote] move tree-processor in
the
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
> become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
>
> Clearly, developping on cocoon with 20 seconds delays between changes is
> a nightmare and would scare people away instantl
Ok,
sitemap code generation is getting slower every day and is likely to
become worse as we add more bugfixes and error generation.
Clearly, developping on cocoon with 20 seconds delays between changes is
a nightmare and would scare people away instantly.
Now that we have a functional interpret
22 matches
Mail list logo
