Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Why use Cocoon at all? Pipelined XML processing is great. Also, Cocoon is really great for mapping URLs to content. Including dynamic content (with some work flow support it would be even better). As for Cocoon aggregation vs. document(): aggregation is good if the st

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-03 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeff Turner wrote: > The problem is conceptual, that document() breaks SoC, as described at > http://localhost:8787/cocoon/documents/faq/faq-xslt.html#faq-6 Hopefully > things like XPathTransformer will remove the need for document() > altogether. I'd be bothered more with the problem that docume

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-03 Thread Robert Koberg
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:15 AM > Robert Koberg wrote: > > >>The problem is conceptual, that document() breaks SoC, as described at > >>http://localhost:8787/cocoon/documents/faq/faq-xslt.html#faq-

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-03 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Robert Koberg wrote: >>The problem is conceptual, that document() breaks SoC, as described at >>http://localhost:8787/cocoon/documents/faq/faq-xslt.html#faq-6 Hopefully >>things like XPathTransformer will remove the need for document() >>altogether. > > > Yea, I have heard the argument. > > I

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-03 Thread Robert Koberg
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Jeff Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 6:35 PM > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:11:28PM -0700, Robert Koberg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the record, I would say it is very easy in XSL. This was from > the original > > bug r

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-03 Thread Peter Nuetzel . inglobo
It could also be done with the evaluate() extension function most XSLT processors provide. Don't know if it should be included in XSLT 2.0 (?) but it is included in EXSLT (exslt.org). -peter -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > While this sort of filte

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-02 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:11:28PM -0700, Robert Koberg wrote: > Hi, > > For the record, I would say it is very easy in XSL. This was from the original > bug report: > > > > To get this with xsl you could simply: > >select="document($book_param)/manual/s1[@title=$section_title_param]"/>

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-02 Thread Robert Koberg
Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:30:21PM +0200, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > > While this sort of filterin

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-02 Thread Jeff Turner
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:30:21PM +0200, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > While this sort of filtering can be done with XSLT, it can't be done > > dynamically, based on an input parameter, because XSLT template patterns > must > > be known at 'compile' time, not runtime, much like the sitemap's > matc

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-02 Thread Joerg Heinicke
> While this sort of filtering can be done with XSLT, it can't be done > dynamically, based on an input parameter, because XSLT template patterns must > be known at 'compile' time, not runtime, much like the sitemap's matchers. See > cocoon-users discussion: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12235] New: - [PATCH] XPathTransformer

2002-09-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b