[SUMMARY]: document() XSLT function not working properly [WAS: Is this as anomaly ?]

Folks, the anomaly I've found (document XSLT function returning a string instead of a node-set) is linked to the Xalan version AND the incremental-processing parameter. It could be summarized as follows: 1) Xalan 2.2.0.D14 and incremental-processing set to true: Error 2) Xalan 2.2.0.D14

Re: R: R: Is this as anomaly ?

Luca Morandini wrote: Vadim, thanks, one can always trust you :) Just two things: 1) I'll submit the bug to BugZilla 2) You (developers) set incremental-processing to false by default in 2.1 and 2.0.4 Let me know bug # and I will change the default in 2.0.4. Vadim Best regards, Luca

R: Is this as anomaly ?

Folks, I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put into BugZilla, or it is the intended behaviour: any good soul listening ? Best regards, P.S. By the way, I deem this mis-handling of the document() function

Re: R: Is this as anomaly ?

Luca Morandini wrote: Folks, I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put into BugZilla, or it is the intended behaviour: any good soul listening ? Answer to your question: Yes, anomaly; No, it is not supposed

R: R: Is this as anomaly ?

[mailto:vadim.gritsenko;verizon.net] Inviato: venerdì 25 ottobre 2002 15.27 A: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: Re: R: Is this as anomaly ? Luca Morandini wrote: Folks, I've sent the following message a couple days ago and no answer came. I'd like only to know whether this is an anomaly to put

Is this as anomaly ?

Is this as an anomaly or it supposed to behave this way ? Best regards, P.S. BTW, in Cocoon 2.0.2 the default was false, while in the 2.0.3 it is true, therefore, I hade an hard time to figure this out :( - Luca Morandini GIS