Re: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-03 Thread giacomo
Thanks for pointing it out again. Giacomo On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > Yeah, I know Stefano doesn't like that, but so many people feel the need > > for it... So Stefano, if you don't like that, please give us a cool > > explanation like the one you

Re: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-03 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Yeah, I know Stefano doesn't like that, but so many people feel the need > for it... So Stefano, if you don't like that, please give us a cool > explanation like the one you gave for "views from last label". IIRC this > has to do with cacheability, but CachingStreamPipelin

Re: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline

2002-04-03 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Hi, > > just a short and simple RT for today: > > What do you all think about merging the stream and the event pipeline > into one single interface/object? > This would make the system less complex and reduce lookups per request > as well. I agree, +1. I've been bug

Re: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-03 Thread Torsten Curdt
> >Hi, > > > >just a short and simple RT for today: > > > >What do you all think about merging the stream and the event pipeline > >into one single interface/object? > >This would make the system less complex and reduce lookups per request > >as well. > > > > +1. +1 > > I'd like also we take a f

RE: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-03 Thread giacomo
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > I'd like also we take a formal decision about allowing a Serializer to > > be a SitemapModelComponent. This comes regularly on the table, and there > > have been several uses cases showing the need for it, mainly to acc

RE: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > Also, Carsten, can you please explain how a SourceResolver fetched from > a CM will handle the per-request data used to resolve sources, i.e. the > Environment and Processor used by SitemapSource and the context prefix > set by sitemap mounts ? Will this be based on R

Re: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >>I'd like also we take a formal decision about allowing a Serializer to >>be a SitemapModelComponent. This comes regularly on the table, and there >>have been several uses cases showing the need for it, mainly to access >>the SourceResolver. An

RE: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > I'd like also we take a formal decision about allowing a Serializer to > be a SitemapModelComponent. This comes regularly on the table, and there > have been several uses cases showing the need for it, mainly to access > the SourceResolver. And I've got a new use cas

RE: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Gerhard Froehlich
streams. However -> kool Carsten. ~Gerhard "Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma." >-Original Message- >From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:26 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [VOTE] (was: [R

Re: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Ovidiu Predescu
Three +1 from me too. Please post the new interface for the new pipeline so I can think of how to modify the code in Schecoon accordingly. Thanks, Ovidiu On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 08:26:08 -0800 (PST), Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for (merging the stream and the event pipeline). >

Re: [VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 for (merging the stream and the event pipeline). +1 for (Allow a Serializer to be a SitemapModelComponent. ***I REALLY NEED THIS***) +1 for (Configurable pipelines) Thanks, dims --- Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >just a short and simple RT

[VOTE] (was: [RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline)

2002-04-02 Thread Sylvain Wallez
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >Hi, > >just a short and simple RT for today: > >What do you all think about merging the stream and the event pipeline >into one single interface/object? >This would make the system less complex and reduce lookups per request >as well. > +1. I'd like also we take a forma

Re: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline

2002-04-02 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
From: "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What do you all think about merging the stream and the event pipeline > into one single interface/object? You mean something like: { String ROLE = "org.apache.cocoon.components.pipeline.Pipeline"; boolean process(...) void setGenerato

[RT]: Merging Stream And Event Pipeline

2002-04-02 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Hi, just a short and simple RT for today: What do you all think about merging the stream and the event pipeline into one single interface/object? This would make the system less complex and reduce lookups per request as well. The splitting into those two objects was done to help implementing th