Re: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec

2001-06-20 Thread giacomo
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Christian Haul wrote: > Hi all. > > The attached patch adds the ability to specify a "target" in a > tag. The "target" is available as "{1}" > in the resource specification. Why not as "{target}"? And why not substitutable? > > > Example > > > > > >

RE: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec

2001-06-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> -Original Message- > From: giacomo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 15:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec > > > On Wed, 20 Jun

Re: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec

2001-06-21 Thread Christian Haul
On 20.Jun.2001 -- 09:26 PM, giacomo wrote: > > Why not as "{target}"? And why not substitutable? > Just thought "{1}" is more common. OK, that's probably because the wildcard matcher is the most common one. Sure I can change it to "target". What do you mean by "not substitutable"? It is done b

Re: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec

2001-06-21 Thread Christian Haul
On 20.Jun.2001 -- 04:20 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > I would not say why not to use as elsewhere else... > Like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would be much more consistent. Vadim, yes tha

RE: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec

2001-06-21 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
> -Original Message- > From: Donald Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > > The attached patch adds the ability to specify a "target" in a > > > > tag. The "target" is available as "{1}" > > > > in the resource specification. > > > > > >

RE: [Patch][C2.1] sitemap redirections + target spec

2001-06-21 Thread Donald Ball
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > about making that a transparent choice? e.g. > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > would appear the same to the FileGenerator...? > > But this seems like even better solution. > > BTW, Is it FS or not? :) gack!!! sometimes, it's okay to