Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2002 10:41, Michael Wechner wrote:
>
>>. . .
>>But what about setting up a dynamic server in the "background" where a
>>CMS is installed and allows emails as "input" and "commiters and
>>contributers" can manage the documentation (WYSIWYG or on th
> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I do intend to get involved with Forrest, if I can help with
> this aspect, then great.
Do we need to warm up your seat already?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 09:51 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
> Whether this is done using Wiki/chaperon / slash-edit / XMLForm /
> Michael Hartle -style editors, I'm open to anything that is simple and
> works across a variety of browsers, as Forrest currently is trying to
> do.
>
I do intend to
On Monday 10 June 2002 10:41, Michael Wechner wrote:
>. . .
> But what about setting up a dynamic server in the "background" where a
> CMS is installed and allows emails as "input" and "commiters and
> contributers" can manage the documentation (WYSIWYG or on the command
> line).
>...
Certainly a
> From: Jeremy Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 08:53 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
>
> >> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > I was thinking of something along these lines for Forrest
> > however, where
> > non-Cocoon documentors (Xerces, Axis, etc)
As I understand from your conversation is that one of your problems is
that you are not allowed to setup a dynamic server.
But what about setting up a dynamic server in the "background" where a
CMS is installed and allows emails as "input" and "commiters and
contributers" can manage the documen
On Monday, June 10, 2002, at 08:53 AM, Steven Noels wrote:
>> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>>
>> On Monday 10 June 2002 09:00, John Morrison wrote:
>>> . . .
>>> We are not allowed to run a dynamic server.
>>> . . .
>>
>> I know - what Jeremy was suggesting is a mechani
At 10:05 10/06/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>On Monday 10 June 2002 09:53, Steven Noels wrote:
> >. . .
> > I was thinking of something along these lines for Forrest however, where
> > non-Cocoon documentors (Xerces, Axis, etc) probably don't have an
> > instance of Cocoon running on their workstation.
On Monday 10 June 2002 09:53, Steven Noels wrote:
>. . .
> I was thinking of something along these lines for Forrest however, where
> non-Cocoon documentors (Xerces, Axis, etc) probably don't have an
> instance of Cocoon running on their workstation.
If Cocoon is not available, what might help is
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Monday 10 June 2002 09:00, John Morrison wrote:
> >. . .
> > We are not allowed to run a dynamic server.
> >. . .
>
> I know - what Jeremy was suggesting is a mechanism where the
> dynamic part
> runs on the user's Cocoon server, and s
On Monday 10 June 2002 09:00, John Morrison wrote:
>. . .
> We are not allowed to run a dynamic server.
>. . .
I know - what Jeremy was suggesting is a mechanism where the dynamic part
runs on the user's Cocoon server, and sends doc updates/comments to bugzilla.
Kind of a "cocoon feedback cli
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Friday 07 June 2002 11:37, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> >. . .
> > On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 06:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >. . .
> > > So a parallel wiki (or whatever) structure is the way to go
> > > IMHO, but this
> > > comes once
On Friday 07 June 2002 11:37, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>. . .
> On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 06:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>. . .
> > So a parallel wiki (or whatever) structure is the way to go
> > IMHO, but this
> > comes once again to the question of having a dynamic server for
> > the Cocoon w
On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 01:51 PM, Diana Shannon wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 05:37 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
>> If we had something similar to BugZilla for documentation,
>> that would accept emailed doc updates, then the work of the
>> editor could take place on the servers set
From: "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > From: Brian Topping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > documentation. But if the documentation process (context
> > diffs contributed as patches to bugzilla) is more difficult
> > than the change itself (maybe a sentence or two in some
> > cases), I am
> From: Brian Topping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> documentation. But if the documentation process (context
> diffs contributed as patches to bugzilla) is more difficult
> than the change itself (maybe a sentence or two in some
> cases), I am less inclined to make a contribution since I
> also n
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: Re: Wiki documentation system
>
> +1 -- But while we're all talking about all the cool tools we could
> develop/use to document...let us not forget the actual
> process of cl
+1 -- But while we're all talking about all the cool tools we could
develop/use to document...let us not forget the actual
process of clicking keys and generating textual content (that could be
easily transformed to format-X later) with links
and explanations on how to use the already developed/
+1
>My cocoon-wiki pipedreams were along the lines of what you just said. Allow
>the user to edit as wiki-syntax, but convert to XML for storage.
>-pete
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comm
On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 05:37 AM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> If we had something similar to BugZilla for documentation, that would
> accept emailed doc updates, then the work of the editor could take
> place on the servers set up by the users, and posted to the Doc
> BugZilla for checking and
On Friday, June 7, 2002, at 06:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Friday 07 June 2002 02:35, Diana Shannon wrote:
>> . . .
>> I agree. I think the dynamic capabilities inherent in Cocoon's
>> distribution are underutilized. I'd also like to use it for
>> more dynamic
>> How-Tos, something t
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 11:33 PM, Michael Hartle wrote:
> Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Stephen Ng wrote:
>>
>>> Cocoon doc in wiki format would make it much easier for those
>>> of us more
>>> casual cocoon users to contribute suggestions, doc bugs, and
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Peter Royal wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2002 03:53 pm, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> > Are you sure you want to keep the docs in wiki format, or maybe
> > make an editor that allows people to edit XML docs as wiki text
> > in a form, having them saved back as XML again. (This is ho
On Thursday 06 June 2002 21:57, Peter Royal wrote:
>. . .
> My cocoon-wiki pipedreams were along the lines of what you just said. Allow
> the user to edit as wiki-syntax, but convert to XML for storage.
>. . .
I think all the pieces are here today in Cocoon to implement a wiki along
these lines:
On Friday 07 June 2002 02:35, Diana Shannon wrote:
>. . .
> I agree. I think the dynamic capabilities inherent in Cocoon's
> distribution are underutilized. I'd also like to use it for more dynamic
> How-Tos, something that would extend existing examples.
>. . .
Yes, it's more about having a dyna
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 03:53 PM, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> This gives me wild thoughts, we could make an editor, included in the
> standard build, which provides a locally served form-based interface
> which allows cocoon users to submit documentation/doc-
> updates/doc-patches/recipes etc
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Stephen Ng wrote:
>
>> Cocoon doc in wiki format would make it much easier for those of us more
>> casual cocoon users to contribute suggestions, doc bugs, and minor
>> clarifications.
>
> Are you sure you want to keep the docs in wik
On Thursday 06 June 2002 03:53 pm, Jeremy Quinn wrote:
> Are you sure you want to keep the docs in wiki format, or maybe
> make an editor that allows people to edit XML docs as wiki text
> in a form, having them saved back as XML again. (This is how I
> was thinking of using it ...)
My cocoon-wik
Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
> On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Stephen Ng wrote:
>
>> Cocoon doc in wiki format would make it much easier for those of us more
>> casual cocoon users to contribute suggestions, doc bugs, and minor
>> clarifications.
>>
>
> Are you sure you want to keep the docs in
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, at 07:36 PM, Stephen Ng wrote:
> Cocoon doc in wiki format would make it much easier for those
> of us more
> casual cocoon users to contribute suggestions, doc bugs, and minor
> clarifications.
>
Are you sure you want to keep the docs in wiki format, or maybe
make
Topping [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Wiki documentation system
>
>
> [apologies for the x-post]
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailt
[apologies for the x-post]
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Subject: RE: Parameterizing Sitemap with XMLForms
>
> There is no one good document explaining this... I believe should be
> explained somewhere
Vadim, thanks for the response, I'll che
32 matches
Mail list logo
